How much does your phone plan really cost, once you count tax and the income behind it?How much does your phone plan really cost, once you add the tax stack and the income tax behind it?
Example price
$5,400
Example all in
$6,890
tax included
Example earn first
$9,794
Single filer on $75,000 in Harris County, Texas. Your calculator below uses your settings.

Your phone bill carries one of the highest hidden tax rates of anything you buy regularly — about 27.6%, nearly four times a normal sales tax.
Wireless service carries one of the highest hidden tax rates of any regular purchase — about 27.6% on average, nearly four times a typical sales tax.
A phone bill isn't taxed like a normal purchase. First your state and city add their own charges — about 14.25% on average, covering things like emergency-service fees and state phone funds. Then the federal government adds a Universal Service Fund charge, and this one works oddly. The FCC assumes about 37.1% of your bill counts as long-distance service. It then charges about 36% on just that portion. That works out to about 13.36% of your whole bill. Add both layers and you get about 27.6% nationally. Where you live matters a lot. Illinois runs about 38.32%. Idaho is only about 16.82%.
A wireless bill isn't taxed like a normal purchase — it carries a state/local layer (about 14.25% on average: sales-tax analogs, state USF funds, emergency-service fees, local franchise fees) PLUS a federal Universal Service Fund surcharge, which works differently than any other tax on this site: the FCC applies its quarterly contribution factor (about 36% as of mid-2025) only to the about 37.1% of a wireless bill it deems 'interstate revenue' under a safe-harbor rule — which nets out to an effective about 13.36% on the whole bill. Combined, that's about 27.6% nationally. It varies enormously by state: Illinois carriers pass through about 38.32% in combined tax and fees, Idaho only about 16.82%. The old three percent federal excise tax on phone service was repealed for wireless in 2006 and does not apply.
- We use the national average phone tax rate (about 27.6%), not your own state's. Real rates run from about 16.82% in Idaho up to about 38.32% in Illinois.Uses the national average combined wireless tax/fee rate (about 27.6%) rather than your specific state — actual combined rates range from about 16.82% (Idaho) to about 38.32% (Illinois).
- The federal part of that rate is itself an average. The FCC resets its rate every three months, so the exact charge on your bill shifts from quarter to quarter.The federal Universal Service Fund component is itself a national average of an effective rate (a safe-harbor percentage of the bill × the FCC's quarterly contribution factor) — real carrier line-items vary quarter to quarter as the FCC resets that factor.
- The invested-instead comparison assumes you keep paying the same monthly bill for however many years you choose, and that the money would have been invested at the long-run market return instead.The compounding comparison assumes the money is a fixed monthly commitment held for the years you specify, invested at the long-run market return if it weren't spent — the same lens as the coffee-habit category.
The 14.25% state/local wireless layer is a NATIONAL AVERAGE, not your state's rate. Real rates range from under 2% to over 25% depending on the state and locality, which is a larger swing than anything else on this page. The federal USF surcharge genuinely is national.
The income tax in this figure is still computed from Texas and your filing status.
to cover a phone plan
$6,890 invested upfront, assuming 7% a year. Includes your starting money and its growth. An illustration, not a forecast; investment growth is separate from the purchase cost above.
- Income tax (federal, FICA, state)30%$2,904
- Excise tax15%$1,490
- Phone plan55%$5,400
- Income tax (federal, FICA, state)
- Excise tax
- Phone plan
Data for nerds — sources, confidence and assumptions
Data for nerdssources, confidence, assumptions
Where each number comes from
| Component | Amount | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Item price | $5,400.00 | Your figureHigh confidence. You supplied this, so it is exact by definition. |
| Excise tax | $1,490.40 | StatutoryHigh confidence. This number is the law — federal, FICA and state tax rates are published rates, so the only real risk is staleness. |
| Income tax to earn it | $2,904.06 | StatutoryHigh confidence. This number is the law — federal, FICA and state tax rates are published rates, so the only real risk is staleness. |
Jurisdiction applied
- State:
TX - Local income tax: none selected
Assumptions
- We use the national average phone tax rate (about 27.6%), not your own state's. Real rates run from about 16.82% in Idaho up to about 38.32% in Illinois.
- The federal part of that rate is itself an average. The FCC resets its rate every three months, so the exact charge on your bill shifts from quarter to quarter.
- The invested-instead comparison assumes you keep paying the same monthly bill for however many years you choose, and that the money would have been invested at the long-run market return instead.
- Uses the national average combined wireless tax/fee rate (about 27.6%) rather than your specific state — actual combined rates range from about 16.82% (Idaho) to about 38.32% (Illinois).
- The federal Universal Service Fund component is itself a national average of an effective rate (a safe-harbor percentage of the bill × the FCC's quarterly contribution factor) — real carrier line-items vary quarter to quarter as the FCC resets that factor.
- The compounding comparison assumes the money is a fixed monthly commitment held for the years you specify, invested at the long-run market return if it weren't spent — the same lens as the coffee-habit category.
Sources
Your position in the tax system
29.65% on the next dollarEvery extra dollar you earn is taxed at your marginal rate, not your average one — which is why a purchase costs more to fund than a paycheck stub suggests.
Marginal rates are read in gross-income terms: below the standard deduction an extra dollar of pay adds nothing to taxable income, so the true rate there is 0%, not the lowest bracket's. Excludes pre-tax deductions (401(k), HSA), which would lower all three.
Same purchase, different state
TX is #7 of 51The purchase inputs and income stay the same. Your row uses your calculator settings; other states use example counties and omit local income tax. Spread across all 51: $1,419, from Alaska to California.
- $9,794
- Texasyou$9,794
- $11,213
Choose a state name to compare against somewhere else.
Where every dollar goes
30% never reaches youThe $9,794.46 you must earn, followed to where it lands. Select a band to isolate it.
- Federal income tax$2,154.78
- FICA (Social Security + Medicare)$749.28
- Phone plan$5,400.00
- Excise tax$1,490.40
Each tax layer is the extra tax this purchase causes — that layer's tax at your income subtracted from its tax at your income plus the gross-up — so bracket boundaries the purchase straddles are handled correctly rather than smoothed over with an average rate.
Is a raise actually a raise?
you keep 70%A raise arrives on top of everything you already earn, so it is taxed at your marginal rate — not the average rate on your whole salary.
Federal, FICA, state and any local income tax — no pre-tax deductions, benefit changes, or payroll withholding quirks, all of which move the real figure. Moving into a higher bracket never taxes the income below the threshold: only the dollars above it pay the higher rate.
Keep going
What you must earn to buy it
A $75,000 Texas salary
| Sticker price | $90.00 |
|---|---|
| Out of pocket | $90.00 |
| Income tax on earning it | $37.92 |
| Hours of work | 3.5 hr |
29.64% of that pay never reaches the purchase.
This example uses the entered price and applicable sales tax. The full calculation above may also include excise taxes.
If the money stayed put
A $75,000 Texas salary
| Spent today | $90 |
|---|---|
| Growth given up | $71 |
| Pay needed to buy it | $128 |
Assumes a 6% annual return that you can edit. This example uses the entered price and applicable sales tax. The full calculation above may also include excise taxes.
A year of that habit
A $75,000 Texas salary
| Spent a year | $23,400 |
|---|---|
| You must earn | $33,262 |
| Times a year | 260 |
Work hours include time spent earning the tax. This example uses the entered price and applicable sales tax. The full calculation above may also include excise taxes.
What it adds up to
A $75,000 Texas salary
| Cash paid | $10,800 |
|---|---|
| Hours of work | 2.4 work months |
| A year | $1,080 |
| Growth given up | $3,435 |
Today’s price held constant; no price rises assumed. This example uses the entered price and applicable sales tax. The full calculation above may also include excise taxes.
Questions people ask
Why does a small regular cost need such a big salary behind it?
The money leaves after tax but has to be earned before it. Repeat that on a monthly cycle and the gap compounds — the salary needed grows faster than the cost itself.
Is the tax on this the same wherever I am?
For this one, broadly yes. The tax that applies here is set federally or is absent everywhere, so it does not move between states — which is why this page shows one figure rather than fifty-one. Your own income tax still depends on where you live.
Why count money I was going to spend anyway?
Nothing on the bill shows it, which is why it is easy to ignore. The return the money would have made had it stayed invested is a genuine cost of spending it instead.
What does this figure leave out?
Specific things, named below rather than glossed over. Where the real rule has an edge this model does not follow, the note says so, so you can judge whether your purchase falls inside it.
Why does a recurring outlay require disproportionate gross income?
Consumption is funded from post-tax income, so required gross income is the outlay divided by one minus the marginal rate on the relevant income slice. For a recurring cost that grossed-up figure recurs at the same cadence, which is why annualised gross requirement exceeds the nominal annual outlay by the full marginal wedge.
Why is this purchase modeled nationally rather than per state?
This category's spend-side treatment is uniform nationally: either the levy is federal, or no state imposes a general sales tax on it. A single national figure is therefore accurate rather than a simplification. Earn-side liability remains state-dependent and is computed separately.
What justifies including forgone investment return in a cost figure?
Opportunity cost is the return forgone by consuming rather than investing the same sum over the modeled horizon. It is an economic cost rather than a cash outlay, so it is reported separately from cash totals and never added to them silently. ⚠️ It depends on an assumed rate of return and is the most assumption-sensitive figure on the page.
What are the stated limits of this category's model?
Modeling limits for this category are stated explicitly on the page rather than inferred. They typically concern classification edge cases, per-item caps, or local levies outside the modeled base. Where a limit applies to a reader's specific purchase, the figure should be treated as a lower or upper bound as the note describes.