Live in California, work in Arizona

Everyday commuter cars and a bus crossing a steel river bridge beside an American city.

State income tax on wages · single filer · tax year 2026

Arizona takes

$1,098

on wages earned there

California takes

$695

after the credit it gives

Both together

$1,793

state tax for the year

Cost of the line

$0

a year, above working at home

What crossing the line costs

credit covers it
$
State tax total
$1,793
to both states, for the year
Because of the commute
$0
above working in California
Credit from California
$1,098
covers the work state in full

California charges more, so its credit covers everything Arizona takes. Both states collect; your total does not change. Solid is what you actually pay; the faded part of the California bar is the credit it hands back. State income tax only — federal and payroll tax apply on top, and a city wage tax may too.

Which state taxes you, and what it costs

  • California is the dearer of these two states, and that works in your favor here. Whatever Arizona takes out of your pay comes straight back off your California bill. The total lands at $1,793, which is exactly what you would owe with a job at home. Do not mistake that for being untaxed by Arizona — it takes $1,098, and California simply covers it.
  • Of all the states feeding workers into Arizona, California sends the most: 21,163 jobs. That makes this the largest crossing of its kind into the state, out of 2 of them.
  • Both states tax these wages and the commuter pays no more than they would have at home. Arizona takes its non-resident share first — $1,098 at the reference salary — and California, whose own liability on the same income is the larger of the two, credits that amount in full and collects the balance. The total is $1,793, identical to what an earner living and working in California would owe. ⚠️ The money is split between two treasuries rather than reduced, which matters at filing time: two state returns, not one.
  • Measured against every other state sending commuters into Arizona, this is the largest single flow: 21,163 jobs held by California residents, ahead of all 2 corridors of this size into that state. Census LODES counts jobs rather than people, so a worker holding two positions in Arizona appears twice.

Where the money goes

A $75,000 salary

  • Federal income tax$7,670
  • Social Security and Medicare$5,738
  • State income tax$2,928
  • Yours$58,665
Federal income tax10.23%$7,670
Social Security and Medicare7.65%$5,738
State income tax3.9%$2,928
Yours78.22%$58,665

Which rung you are on

A $75,000 salary

22%federal, on your next dollar0-16100001610000-28500002850000-66500006650000-12180000 · you are here12180000-2178750021787500-2723250027232500-6567000065670000-topyou
This rung starts at$66,500
Next rung starts at$121,800
Room before it$46,800

Federal only, measured on gross pay — so the first rung is what the standard deduction covers.

The arithmetic, step by step

California to Arizona state tax breakdown
Arizona takes, on wages earned there$1,098
California charges its residents$1,793
Less the credit California gives$1,098
Total state tax$1,793
If you also worked in California$1,793
Difference$0

On a reference salary of $60,000 a year, single filer. Both states run progressive schedules, so the figures do not simply scale — use the tool above for your own salary.

What this page does not cover

  • One thing this page leaves out: city taxes. Some cities charge their own tax on people who work there, and it sits on top of everything above. Philadelphia is the well-known one. New York City only charges its own residents, so commuting in adds nothing. Check whether the city you work in is one that charges, because the Arizona state figure is not the whole story if it does.
  • Two assumptions sit under this page. First, that Arizona is where all your pay comes from. Second, that you go there rather than working from your kitchen in California. Mixed income changes how the credit is worked out, and remote days have their own rules in some states.
  • Every dollar figure here uses a salary of sixty thousand a year. It is a stated benchmark, not a guess at what people on this route earn. Scale them to your own pay. Which state ends up dearer, California or Arizona, generally holds at other salaries — though the gap between them can widen or narrow as you cross tax brackets.
  • These figures cover the STATE layer only. City and municipal wage taxes sit on top of them and are not included: a commuter into Philadelphia pays its wage tax on top of anything here, and Ohio's municipalities run their own credit system, which this site models in its own families. New York City, by contrast, taxes only its residents, so a commuter into it adds nothing at the city level. Whether Arizona or California carries a local layer is a separate question from the state arithmetic above.
  • The arithmetic assumes all wages are earned in Arizona and that there is no other income. That matters for the credit: where income comes from several states, California limits the credit to the share of its own tax attributable to the Arizona portion, computed as a ratio rather than the straightforward cap used above. It also assumes days are worked in Arizona rather than remotely — several states tax a non-resident's remote days as though they were worked at the employer's location, which reverses the usual expectation and is handled on this site's reciprocity pages.
  • Dollar amounts are computed at a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a corridor wage average, which no published source provides per state pair. Because both states' liabilities and the credit between them are functions of the same income, the direction of the California to Arizona comparison holds at other salaries even though the amounts do not — with one qualification worth stating, that a progressive schedule can change the SIZE of the gap at higher incomes, and in Arizona's case a bracket crossed on one side and not the other is exactly where that happens.

Questions people ask

Do I pay state tax twice, to California and Arizona?

You file in both states, but you do not pay the full amount to both. California credits the tax Arizona collected, capped at its own charge on that income. The practical result is one bill at the higher of the two levels: $1,793 for the year.

Does working in Arizona cost me anything extra?

It costs you nothing in tax. $1,793 is what you owe whether you work in Arizona or at home in California. The only real cost of the crossing is the extra return.

Do I have to file tax returns in both California and Arizona?

Two returns is the normal outcome here, even when only one state ends up taking anything. Arizona generally wants to see a non-resident return from people who work there, and California wants your whole picture. It is paperwork rather than extra tax.

What if I work from home in California some days instead of going to Arizona?

Working from home usually moves that day's pay out of Arizona and into California alone. A handful of states disagree and tax remote days as if you had commuted. This page assumes you actually travel to Arizona, so if a lot of your week is at home the split will differ from what you see here.

How is liability allocated between residence and work state on the same wages?

Both jurisdictions assert a claim on the same wages — Arizona on a source basis, California on residence. The residence state grants a credit for tax paid to the source state, limited to the residence state's own liability on that income. Net combined liability therefore equals the greater of the two liabilities rather than their sum, $1,793 at the reference salary, and the split between the two treasuries is the only thing the credit changes.

Why is the marginal state-tax cost of this crossing zero?

Marginal cost is zero because the binding liability is the residence state's. California's own charge on this income equals or exceeds Arizona's, so the resident credit absorbs the source-state tax entirely and combined liability equals residence-only liability, $1,793. ⚠️ Zero marginal tax is not zero obligation: a non-resident return may still be required in Arizona.

What filing obligations arise in each state on this corridor?

Generally two. California requires a resident return reporting all income; Arizona requires a non-resident return reporting the income sourced to it, which is also the mechanism by which the resident credit is substantiated. ⚠️ A filing obligation is distinct from a liability: a reciprocity exemption or a zero net position removes tax without necessarily removing the return, and the non-resident return is frequently what establishes the credit claimed on the resident one.

How do remote working days affect sourcing between these two states?

Ordinarily wages are sourced to where the services are performed, so days worked remotely from California fall outside Arizona's jurisdiction and the source-state apportionment shrinks accordingly. ⛔ The exception is the "convenience of the employer" rule, which several states apply: a non-resident's remote days are sourced to the employer's location unless the remote work is required by the employer rather than chosen by the employee. The figures on this page model in-person attendance in Arizona throughout.