Live in Nevada, work in Utah
State income tax on wages · single filer · tax year 2026
Utah takes
$2,670
on wages earned there
Nevada takes
$0
after the credit it gives
Both together
$2,670
state tax for the year
Cost of the line
$2,670
a year, above working at home
What crossing the line costs
costs youUtah charges more than Nevada would, and Nevada only credits you up to its own bill — so the difference stays with you. Solid is what you actually pay; the faded part of the Nevada bar is the credit it hands back. State income tax only — federal and payroll tax apply on top, and a city wage tax may too.
Which state taxes you, and what it costs
- You are not taxed twice over. You are taxed at the higher of the two rates, which is its own kind of bad news. Nevada hands back what you paid Utah, but only as far as its own bill goes. Anything Utah charges above that, you keep paying. On this salary the year comes to $2,670. Work at home instead and it would be $0.
- This is not one of the country's big crossings. 6,733 jobs in Utah are held by people living in Nevada. The tax rules do not care about that — they are the same ones that apply to the busiest routes in the country. What can differ is how used to the paperwork your employer is.
- Utah taxes wages earned inside its borders by non-residents, and Nevada taxes its residents on the same wages wherever they are earned. The resident credit resolves the overlap but does not erase it: Nevada credits tax paid to Utah only up to what it would itself have charged on that income, so the commuter settles at the higher of the two liabilities rather than the sum. At the reference salary that is $2,670 against $0 for the same earner working at home — $2,670 attributable to the state line itself. ⚠️ The corollary is the part most readers have backwards: moving to a cheaper home state while keeping the job in Utah changes the split between the two treasuries and not the total.
- This is a smaller corridor by national standards — 6,733 jobs in Utah held by Nevada residents — but the rules that govern it are the same rules that govern the largest ones. Corridor size changes how familiar an employer's payroll department is with the paperwork, never the tax treatment.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- Yours$61,593
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| Yours82.12% | $61,593 |
Which rung you are on
A $75,000 salary
| This rung starts at | $66,500 |
|---|---|
| Next rung starts at | $121,800 |
| Room before it | $46,800 |
Federal only, measured on gross pay — so the first rung is what the standard deduction covers.
The arithmetic, step by step
| Utah takes, on wages earned there | $2,670 |
|---|---|
| Nevada charges its residents | $0 |
| Less the credit Nevada gives | $0 |
| Total state tax | $2,670 |
| If you also worked in Nevada | $0 |
| Difference | $2,670 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year, single filer. Both states run progressive schedules, so the figures do not simply scale — use the tool above for your own salary.
What this page does not cover
- What you see here is state tax between Nevada and Utah. Cities can charge their own tax on top, and a handful do. That layer is not modeled on this page, so treat these figures as the floor rather than the final bill.
- These numbers assume the job in Utah is your only income, and that you actually go there to work. Both matter. If you earn money in more than one state, the credit Nevada gives is worked out as a share rather than the simple cap used here. And if you work from home some days, some states have rules that treat those days as worked at the office anyway.
- Sixty thousand a year is the assumption behind these amounts, chosen because nobody publishes average pay for a route between two states. At your own salary the numbers shift. The conclusion about which of Nevada and Utah takes more usually does not, but the size of the difference can.
- These figures cover the STATE layer only. City and municipal wage taxes sit on top of them and are not included: a commuter into Philadelphia pays its wage tax on top of anything here, and Ohio's municipalities run their own credit system, which this site models in its own families. New York City, by contrast, taxes only its residents, so a commuter into it adds nothing at the city level. Whether Utah or Nevada carries a local layer is a separate question from the state arithmetic above.
- The arithmetic assumes all wages are earned in Utah and that there is no other income. That matters for the credit: where income comes from several states, Nevada limits the credit to the share of its own tax attributable to the Utah portion, computed as a ratio rather than the straightforward cap used above. It also assumes days are worked in Utah rather than remotely — several states tax a non-resident's remote days as though they were worked at the employer's location, which reverses the usual expectation and is handled on this site's reciprocity pages.
- Dollar amounts are computed at a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a corridor wage average, which no published source provides per state pair. Because both states' liabilities and the credit between them are functions of the same income, the direction of the Nevada to Utah comparison holds at other salaries even though the amounts do not — with one qualification worth stating, that a progressive schedule can change the SIZE of the gap at higher incomes, and in Utah's case a bracket crossed on one side and not the other is exactly where that happens.
Questions people ask
Do I pay state tax twice, to Nevada and Utah?
Not twice over. Both states have a claim — Utah because you earn the money there, Nevada because you live there — but Nevada gives you credit for what Utah took. The credit stops at what Nevada would have charged on its own, so what you actually pay is the bigger of the two bills. Here that comes to $2,670 for the year.
Would moving out of Nevada lower my state tax if I keep working in Utah?
Probably not, and this is the part people get wrong. Utah taxes the wages because that is where you earn them, whoever you are and wherever you sleep. Your home state only ever credits you up to its own bill. So moving somewhere cheaper changes which government keeps the money, not how much leaves your pay. What would change it is the job moving, not you.
Do I have to file tax returns in both Nevada and Utah?
Expect two. Living in Nevada means filing there on everything you earn. Working in Utah usually means filing there as well, on the part you earned inside it. The second one is often how the credit gets claimed, so skipping it can cost you money you are owed.
What if I work from home in Nevada some days instead of going to Utah?
Working from home usually moves that day's pay out of Utah and into Nevada alone. A handful of states disagree and tax remote days as if you had commuted. This page assumes you actually travel to Utah, so if a lot of your week is at home the split will differ from what you see here.
How is liability allocated between residence and work state on the same wages?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim on the same wages — Utah on a source basis, Nevada on residence. The residence state grants a credit for tax paid to the source state, limited to the residence state's own liability on that income. Net combined liability therefore equals the greater of the two liabilities rather than their sum, $2,670 at the reference salary, and the split between the two treasuries is the only thing the credit changes.
Does changing residence reduce combined liability while the work state is unchanged?
No, while the source state is unchanged. Utah's claim arises from where the services are performed and is unaffected by residence. Because the residence credit is capped at the residence state's own liability, combined liability equals the greater of the two — so substituting a lower-tax residence reduces the residence-state component toward zero while leaving the total at Utah's level. The binding variable is the work location, not the home one.
What filing obligations arise in each state on this corridor?
Generally two. Nevada requires a resident return reporting all income; Utah requires a non-resident return reporting the income sourced to it, which is also the mechanism by which the resident credit is substantiated. ⚠️ A filing obligation is distinct from a liability: a reciprocity exemption or a zero net position removes tax without necessarily removing the return, and the non-resident return is frequently what establishes the credit claimed on the resident one.
How do remote working days affect sourcing between these two states?
Ordinarily wages are sourced to where the services are performed, so days worked remotely from Nevada fall outside Utah's jurisdiction and the source-state apportionment shrinks accordingly. ⛔ The exception is the "convenience of the employer" rule, which several states apply: a non-resident's remote days are sourced to the employer's location unless the remote work is required by the employer rather than chosen by the employee. The figures on this page model in-person attendance in Utah throughout.