Live in New Hampshire, work in Massachusetts
State income tax on wages · single filer · tax year 2026
Massachusetts takes
$2,680
on wages earned there
New Hampshire takes
$0
after the credit it gives
Both together
$2,680
state tax for the year
Cost of the line
$2,680
a year, above working at home
What crossing the line costs
costs youMassachusetts charges more than New Hampshire would, and New Hampshire only credits you up to its own bill — so the difference stays with you. Solid is what you actually pay; the faded part of the New Hampshire bar is the credit it hands back. State income tax only — federal and payroll tax apply on top, and a city wage tax may too.
Which state taxes you, and what it costs
- Here is the thing people get wrong about New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Moving somewhere cheaper does not help if the job stays put. The state where you work takes its share first, and your home state only refunds up to what it charges itself. That leaves $2,680 a year that exists purely because the job is across the line. All in, $2,680.
- More people make this crossing than any other into Massachusetts. About 99,667 jobs there are held by people living in New Hampshire — the biggest of the 7 routes of this size into the state. Whatever this page says about the tax, it is describing a very well-worn road.
- Massachusetts taxes wages earned inside its borders by non-residents, and New Hampshire taxes its residents on the same wages wherever they are earned. The resident credit resolves the overlap but does not erase it: New Hampshire credits tax paid to Massachusetts only up to what it would itself have charged on that income, so the commuter settles at the higher of the two liabilities rather than the sum. At the reference salary that is $2,680 against $0 for the same earner working at home — $2,680 attributable to the state line itself. ⚠️ The corollary is the part most readers have backwards: moving to a cheaper home state while keeping the job in Massachusetts changes the split between the two treasuries and not the total.
- Measured against every other state sending commuters into Massachusetts, this is the largest single flow: 99,667 jobs held by New Hampshire residents, ahead of all 7 corridors of this size into that state. Census LODES counts jobs rather than people, so a worker holding two positions in Massachusetts appears twice.
Where the money goes
A $75,000 salary
- Federal income tax$7,670
- Social Security and Medicare$5,738
- Yours$61,593
| Federal income tax10.23% | $7,670 |
|---|---|
| Social Security and Medicare7.65% | $5,738 |
| Yours82.12% | $61,593 |
Which rung you are on
A $75,000 salary
| This rung starts at | $66,500 |
|---|---|
| Next rung starts at | $121,800 |
| Room before it | $46,800 |
Federal only, measured on gross pay — so the first rung is what the standard deduction covers.
The arithmetic, step by step
| Massachusetts takes, on wages earned there | $2,680 |
|---|---|
| New Hampshire charges its residents | $0 |
| Less the credit New Hampshire gives | $0 |
| Total state tax | $2,680 |
| If you also worked in New Hampshire | $0 |
| Difference | $2,680 |
On a reference salary of $60,000 a year, single filer. Both states run progressive schedules, so the figures do not simply scale — use the tool above for your own salary.
What this page does not cover
- City wage taxes are not in these numbers. A few places charge them, and where they do the money is real. If your job in Massachusetts is inside a city that taxes workers, add that on top. Where it is not, the state figures above are the whole of it for New Hampshire residents.
- The figures take the simple case: one job, in Massachusetts, worked in person. Money from several states makes the credit a proportion instead of a cap. Working remotely from New Hampshire can pull you under a different rule entirely, depending on the state.
- The dollars rest on one assumed salary of sixty thousand. Double your pay and they do not simply double, because both states charge more on higher slices of income. What tends to stay put is which side of the New Hampshire and Massachusetts comparison you are on.
- These figures cover the STATE layer only. City and municipal wage taxes sit on top of them and are not included: a commuter into Philadelphia pays its wage tax on top of anything here, and Ohio's municipalities run their own credit system, which this site models in its own families. New York City, by contrast, taxes only its residents, so a commuter into it adds nothing at the city level. Whether Massachusetts or New Hampshire carries a local layer is a separate question from the state arithmetic above.
- The arithmetic assumes all wages are earned in Massachusetts and that there is no other income. That matters for the credit: where income comes from several states, New Hampshire limits the credit to the share of its own tax attributable to the Massachusetts portion, computed as a ratio rather than the straightforward cap used above. It also assumes days are worked in Massachusetts rather than remotely — several states tax a non-resident's remote days as though they were worked at the employer's location, which reverses the usual expectation and is handled on this site's reciprocity pages.
- Dollar amounts are computed at a stated reference salary of sixty thousand rather than a corridor wage average, which no published source provides per state pair. Because both states' liabilities and the credit between them are functions of the same income, the direction of the New Hampshire to Massachusetts comparison holds at other salaries even though the amounts do not — with one qualification worth stating, that a progressive schedule can change the SIZE of the gap at higher incomes, and in Massachusetts's case a bracket crossed on one side and not the other is exactly where that happens.
Questions people ask
Do I pay state tax twice, to New Hampshire and Massachusetts?
Both states tax the same wages, and then one of them backs off. Massachusetts taxes what you earn inside it. New Hampshire taxes you on everything, then subtracts what Massachusetts already took, up to the size of its own bill. You end up paying the larger of the two, which is $2,680 a year on this route.
Would moving out of New Hampshire lower my state tax if I keep working in Massachusetts?
Not while you work in Massachusetts. That state's claim comes from where the work happens. New Hampshire is the one giving ground, through the credit, and a cheaper home state gives less ground rather than costing you less. The number that matters is set by Massachusetts.
Do I have to file tax returns in both New Hampshire and Massachusetts?
Two returns is the normal outcome here, even when only one state ends up taking anything. Massachusetts generally wants to see a non-resident return from people who work there, and New Hampshire wants your whole picture. It is paperwork rather than extra tax.
What if I work from home in New Hampshire some days instead of going to Massachusetts?
Working from home usually moves that day's pay out of Massachusetts and into New Hampshire alone. A handful of states disagree and tax remote days as if you had commuted. This page assumes you actually travel to Massachusetts, so if a lot of your week is at home the split will differ from what you see here.
How is liability allocated between residence and work state on the same wages?
Both jurisdictions assert a claim on the same wages — Massachusetts on a source basis, New Hampshire on residence. The residence state grants a credit for tax paid to the source state, limited to the residence state's own liability on that income. Net combined liability therefore equals the greater of the two liabilities rather than their sum, $2,680 at the reference salary, and the split between the two treasuries is the only thing the credit changes.
Does changing residence reduce combined liability while the work state is unchanged?
No, while the source state is unchanged. Massachusetts's claim arises from where the services are performed and is unaffected by residence. Because the residence credit is capped at the residence state's own liability, combined liability equals the greater of the two — so substituting a lower-tax residence reduces the residence-state component toward zero while leaving the total at Massachusetts's level. The binding variable is the work location, not the home one.
What filing obligations arise in each state on this corridor?
Generally two. New Hampshire requires a resident return reporting all income; Massachusetts requires a non-resident return reporting the income sourced to it, which is also the mechanism by which the resident credit is substantiated. ⚠️ A filing obligation is distinct from a liability: a reciprocity exemption or a zero net position removes tax without necessarily removing the return, and the non-resident return is frequently what establishes the credit claimed on the resident one.
How do remote working days affect sourcing between these two states?
Ordinarily wages are sourced to where the services are performed, so days worked remotely from New Hampshire fall outside Massachusetts's jurisdiction and the source-state apportionment shrinks accordingly. ⛔ The exception is the "convenience of the employer" rule, which several states apply: a non-resident's remote days are sourced to the employer's location unless the remote work is required by the employer rather than chosen by the employee. The figures on this page model in-person attendance in Massachusetts throughout.