Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, and English as a Second Language Instructors in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$58,068
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$11,922
17.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$53,488
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$69,990
Kept after tax
$58,068
Worth in national money
$53,488
State rank
7
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. Washington pays this job a middle wage of $69,990, ranking 7 of 50 states and sitting about 13.73% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 256 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $69,990 the take-home is $58,068. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $53,488 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $71,640, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Washington's median for adult basic education, adult secondary education, and english as a second language instructors is $69,990, about 13.73% above the national figure and 7 of 50 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Position 256 of 493 in Washington places adult basic education, adult secondary education, and english as a second language instructors in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $58,068 for adult basic education, adult secondary education, and english as a second language instructors, from $69,990. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $53,488. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $71,640 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, and English as a Second Language Instructors
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $48,930 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $69,990 |
| Top tenth earn over | $98,940 |
| This salary | $69,990 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $58,068 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $58,068 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,268 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $69,990 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$8,015 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of adult basic education, adult secondary education, and english as a second language instructors in Washington earn under $69,990 and half over. The published range runs $48,930 at the tenth percentile to $98,940 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In Washington the take-home figure of $58,068, from $69,990, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 256 of 493 occupations here.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $53,488 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 256.
- Figures are distribution medians for adult basic education, adult secondary education, and english as a second language instructors in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $48,930 to $98,940; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $58,068 from $69,990. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 256 of 493 locally.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $53,488, worked from $69,990, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 256 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $48,930 and the top tenth $98,940, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $53,488 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $58,068 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($48,930 to $98,940) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $53,488 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $58,068 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.