Audiologists in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$85,216
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$23,364
21.5% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$78,495
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$108,580
Kept after tax
$85,216
Worth in national money
$78,495
State rank
9
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. Washington pays audiologists a middle wage of $108,580, ranking 9 of 49 states and sitting about 13.36% above the national middle.
- Within Washington this is well-paid work. Of 493 occupations with published figures in the state, audiologists ranks 83 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $108,580, tax leaves $85,216 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $78,495 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $109,710, since top earners drag the number up.
- Washington's median for audiologists is $108,580, about 13.36% above the national figure and 9 of 49 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Ranked against every occupation Washington publishes a median for, audiologists sits 83 of 493 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- After tax, $85,216 remains from the Washington median of $108,580 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $78,495 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $109,710 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Audiologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $68,310 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $108,580 |
| Top tenth earn over | $137,190 |
| This salary | $108,580 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $85,216 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $85,216 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$9,198 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $108,580 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$12,705 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $108,580 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $68,310 and the ninetieth is $137,190 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- That $85,216 take-home in Washington comes from $108,580. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 83 of 493.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $78,495 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 83.
- The Washington median of $108,580 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $68,310 to $137,190. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Retained pay of $85,216, from $108,580, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 83 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 9 of 49 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $78,495, worked from $108,580, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 83 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $68,310 at the bottom tenth to $137,190 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $78,495 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $85,216 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 49 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($68,310 to $137,190) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $78,495 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $85,216 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.