Buyers and Purchasing Agents in Massachusetts

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$65,331

after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax

Tax takes

$20,639

24.0% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$60,359

Massachusetts costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$85,970

Kept after tax

$65,331

Worth in national money

$60,359

State rank

6

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Massachusetts is one of the better-paying states for buyers and purchasing agents. The middle earner takes $85,970, which ranks 6 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 10.63% above the national middle.
  • Against other work in Massachusetts, this sits in the middle: 154 of 485 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $85,970, tax leaves $65,331 — and because Massachusetts is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $60,359 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $94,180, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Massachusetts ranks 6 of 51 states publishing a median for buyers and purchasing agents, at $85,970 — about 10.63% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Buyers and purchasing agents ranks 154 of 485 occupations in Massachusetts by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • After tax, $65,331 remains from the Massachusetts median of $85,970 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $60,359 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $94,180 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Buyers and Purchasing Agents

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$49,500
Half earn under$85,970
Top tenth earn over$145,890
This salary$85,970

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$3,979take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Massachusetts$65,331
Take-home in Texas$69,310
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$10,966

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $85,970$70,823
$70,823in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$80,315
You could take a cut of−$15,147
Prices in Texas97 vs 108

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of buyers and purchasing agents in Massachusetts earn under $85,970 and half over. The published range runs $49,500 at the tenth percentile to $145,890 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • That $65,331 take-home in Massachusetts comes from $85,970. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 154 of 485.
  • Two cautions on $60,359, the adjusted value of that $85,970 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Massachusetts. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 154 of 485 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for buyers and purchasing agents in Massachusetts, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $49,500 to $145,890; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Retained pay of $65,331, from $85,970, assumes a single Massachusetts filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 154 of 485 locally, and the state ranks 6 of 51 for it.
  • This $60,359 adjusted figure, worked from $85,970, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 154 of 485 in the state. The occupation ranks 154 of 485 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $94,180, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $49,500, the highest tenth $145,890, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

Not on its own. Prices in Massachusetts run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $60,359 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Massachusetts then takes its own share, leaving $65,331.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $94,180. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($49,500) and the ninetieth ($145,890) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $60,359 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $65,331 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.