Cabinetmakers and Bench Carpenters in New Hampshire

Machined metal parts and a CNC machine in a clean manufacturing workshop.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$48,767

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$9,213

15.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$46,293

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$57,980

Kept after tax

$48,767

Worth in national money

$46,293

State rank

5

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • New Hampshire is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $57,980, which ranks 5 of 49 states with published figures. That is about 24.21% above the national middle.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 286.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $57,980, tax leaves $48,767 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $46,293 would nationally. Here the average runs under the middle, at $55,900.
  • New Hampshire ranks 5 of 49 states publishing a median for cabinetmakers and bench carpenters, at $57,980 — about 24.21% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, cabinetmakers and bench carpenters sits at 286 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • After tax, $48,767 remains from the New Hampshire median of $57,980 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $46,293 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $55,900 sits under the median, so the lower tail is the longer one.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Cabinetmakers and Bench Carpenters

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$39,470
Half earn under$57,980
Top tenth earn over$72,540
This salary$57,980

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$48,767
Take-home in Texas$48,767
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$3,892

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $57,980$53,273
$53,273in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$57,980
You could take a cut of−$4,707
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $57,980 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $39,470 and the ninetieth is $72,540 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind New Hampshire's $48,767, worked from $57,980. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 286 of 488.
  • Two cautions on $46,293, the adjusted value of that $57,980 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 286 of 488 locally.
  • The New Hampshire median of $57,980 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $39,470 to $72,540. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • The New Hampshire take-home of $48,767, on $57,980 for work ranking 286 of 488 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 286 of 488 in the state.
  • This $46,293 adjusted figure, worked from $57,980, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 286 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 286 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $55,900, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $39,470 at the bottom tenth to $72,540 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $46,293 of national purchasing power.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Less than people assume. $48,767 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 49 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $55,900. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($39,470 to $72,540) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $46,293 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $48,767 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.