Camera Operators, Television, Video, and Film in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$50,591
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$9,659
16.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$46,601
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$60,250
Kept after tax
$50,591
Worth in national money
$46,601
State rank
20
of 46 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $60,250, ranking 20 of 46 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 493 occupations Washington reports figures for, this is number 309.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $60,250, tax leaves $50,591 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $46,601 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $73,900, since top earners drag the number up.
- Washington occupies the middle band for camera operators, television, video, and film: a median of $60,250, ranking 20 of 46. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
- In Washington's occupational distribution, camera operators, television, video, and film sits at 309 of 493 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- After tax, $50,591 remains from the Washington median of $60,250 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $46,601 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $73,900 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Camera Operators, Television, Video, and Film
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $37,780 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $60,250 |
| Top tenth earn over | $130,410 |
| This salary | $60,250 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $50,591 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $50,591 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,461 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $60,250 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,604 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $60,250 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $37,780 and the ninetieth is $130,410 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- That $50,591 take-home in Washington comes from $60,250. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 309 of 493.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $46,601 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 309.
- The Washington median of $60,250 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $37,780 to $130,410. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Retained pay of $50,591, from $60,250, assumes a single Washington filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 309 of 493 locally, and the state ranks 20 of 46 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $46,601, worked from $60,250, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 309 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $73,900, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $37,780 at the bottom tenth to $130,410 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $46,601 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $50,591 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 46 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $73,900. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($37,780) and the ninetieth ($130,410) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $46,601 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $50,591 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 46 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.