Coating, Painting, and Spraying Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$50,374
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$9,606
16.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$46,401
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$59,980
Kept after tax
$50,374
Worth in national money
$46,401
State rank
2
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Washington is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $59,980, which ranks 2 of 50 states with published figures. That is about 24.31% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 315 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $59,980 the take-home is $50,374. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $46,401 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $68,990, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Washington ranks 2 of 50 states publishing a median for coating, painting, and spraying machine setters, operators, and tenders, at $59,980 — about 24.31% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Position 315 of 493 in Washington places coating, painting, and spraying machine setters, operators, and tenders in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $50,374 for coating, painting, and spraying machine setters, operators, and tenders, from $59,980. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $46,401. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $68,990 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Coating, Painting, and Spraying Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $43,830 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $59,980 |
| Top tenth earn over | $108,960 |
| This salary | $59,980 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $50,374 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $50,374 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,437 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $59,980 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,576 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $59,980 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $43,830 and the ninetieth is $108,960 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $50,374, worked from $59,980. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 315 of 493.
- Two cautions on $46,401, the adjusted value of that $59,980 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 315 of 493 locally.
- The Washington median of $59,980 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $43,830 to $108,960. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- The Washington take-home of $50,374, on $59,980 for work ranking 315 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 315 of 493 in the state.
- This $46,401 adjusted figure, worked from $59,980, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 315 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 315 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $68,990 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $43,830 and the top tenth $108,960 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $46,401 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $50,374 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $68,990. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($43,830) and the ninetieth ($108,960) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $46,401 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $50,374 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.