Compensation and Benefits Managers in Minnesota

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$112,950

after federal, FICA and Minnesota tax

Tax takes

$50,440

30.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$114,767

Minnesota costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$163,390

Kept after tax

$112,950

Worth in national money

$114,767

State rank

9

of 45 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Minnesota is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $163,390, which ranks 9 of 45 states with published figures. That is about 9.49% above the national middle.
  • Within Minnesota this is well-paid work. Of 490 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 11 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • No great distortion either way. Minnesota costs about what the country costs, so from $163,390, take-home of $112,950 is worth roughly $114,767 in national money. The average comes to $168,320, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Minnesota ranks 9 of 45 states publishing a median for compensation and benefits managers, at $163,390 — about 9.49% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Ranked against every occupation Minnesota publishes a median for, compensation and benefits managers sits 11 of 490 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • Price parity in Minnesota is near the national base, so for compensation and benefits managers, whose median is $163,390, the adjusted figure of $114,767 differs little from $112,950 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $168,320 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Compensation and Benefits Managers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$102,690
Half earn under$163,390
Top tenth earn over$231,830
This salary$163,390

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$9,993take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Minnesota$112,950
Take-home in Texas$122,943
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$11,750

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $163,390$146,684
$146,684in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$148,770
You could take a cut of−$16,706
Prices in Texas97 vs 98

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of compensation and benefits managers in Minnesota earn under $163,390 and half over. The published range runs $102,690 at the tenth percentile to $231,830 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Minnesota's $112,950, worked from $163,390. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 11 of 490.
  • One number stands for prices across all of Minnesota, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $114,767, the adjusted value of that $163,390 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 11 of 490 in the state.
  • Figures are distribution medians for compensation and benefits managers in Minnesota, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $102,690 to $231,830; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Minnesota take-home of $112,950, on $163,390 for work ranking 11 of 490 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 11 of 490 in the state.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Minnesota, so $114,767 — the adjusted value of that $163,390 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 11 of 490 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $168,320 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $102,690 and the top tenth $231,830 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $114,767.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Minnesota then takes its own share, leaving $112,950.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 45 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Minnesota is $168,320. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($102,690) and the ninetieth ($231,830) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Minnesota's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $114,767 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $112,950 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Minnesota income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.