Concierges in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$33,476
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$5,474
14.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$31,778
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$38,950
Kept after tax
$33,476
Worth in national money
$31,778
State rank
16
of 47 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- New Hampshire sits in the middle of the pack for concierges. The median is $38,950, ranking 16 of 47 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
- Measured against other jobs in New Hampshire, this one sits low: 441 of 488 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $38,950, tax leaves $33,476 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $31,778 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $39,650, since top earners drag the number up.
- New Hampshire occupies the middle band for concierges: a median of $38,950, ranking 16 of 47. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
- Concierges occupies position 441 of 488 in New Hampshire's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
- After tax, $33,476 remains from the New Hampshire median of $38,950 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $31,778 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $39,650 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Concierges
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $35,920 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $38,950 |
| Top tenth earn over | $44,720 |
| This salary | $38,950 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $33,476 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $33,476 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$2,672 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $38,950 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$3,231 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $38,950. The published range is $35,920 up to $44,720, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $33,476 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $38,950. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 441 of 488.
- Two cautions on $31,778, the adjusted value of that $38,950 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 441 of 488 locally.
- Reported values are medians; for concierges in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $35,920 to $44,720. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $33,476, from $38,950, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 441 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 16 of 47 for it.
- This $31,778 adjusted figure, worked from $38,950, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 441 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 441 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $35,920 at the bottom tenth to $44,720 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $31,778 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $33,476 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 47 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($35,920 to $44,720) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $31,778 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $33,476 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 47 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.