Conservation Scientists in Texas
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$57,104
after federal, FICA and Texas tax
Tax takes
$11,516
16.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$58,764
Texas costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Texas — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$68,620
Kept after tax
$57,104
Worth in national money
$58,764
State rank
37
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- The nominal figure here is modest. Texas pays conservation scientists a middle wage of $68,620, 37 of 51 states and about 6.01% below the national middle. Hold that thought until the adjusted numbers.
- Against other work in Texas, this sits in the middle: 161 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
- No great distortion either way. Texas costs about what the country costs, so from $68,620, take-home of $57,104 is worth roughly $58,764 in national money. The average comes to $71,060, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Texas's $68,620 median for conservation scientists places it 37 of 51 states, about 6.01% below national. Because both the tax and price adjustments tend to favor lower-nominal states, this ranking is the least stable of the three reported here.
- Conservation scientists ranks 161 of 493 occupations in Texas by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
- Price parity in Texas is near the national base, so for conservation scientists, whose median is $68,620, the adjusted figure of $58,764 differs little from $57,104 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $71,060 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Conservation Scientists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $53,440 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $68,620 |
| Top tenth earn over | $92,320 |
| This salary | $68,620 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Texas | $57,104 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Florida | $57,104 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | −$3,566 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $68,620 |
|---|---|
| Raise you would need | +$5,243 |
| Prices in Florida | 103 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Texas earn less than $68,620. The published range is $53,440 up to $92,320, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Texas's $57,104, worked from $68,620. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 161 of 493.
- One number stands for prices across all of Texas, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $58,764, the adjusted value of that $68,620 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 161 of 493 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for conservation scientists in Texas the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $53,440 to $92,320. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- The Texas take-home of $57,104, on $68,620 for work ranking 161 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 161 of 493 in the state.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Texas, so $58,764 — the adjusted value of that $68,620 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 161 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $71,060, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $53,440 at the bottom tenth to $92,320 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $58,764.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $57,104 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Can I compare this job across every state?
This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Texas is $71,060. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($53,440 to $92,320) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Texas rather than a national figure.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Texas's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $58,764 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Texas levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $57,104 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.