Curators in Washington

Books, colored pencils and a globe in a bright classroom.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$60,910

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$13,120

17.7% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$56,106

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$74,030

Kept after tax

$60,910

Worth in national money

$56,106

State rank

10

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for curators is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $74,030, putting the state 10 of 49 — about 16.73% ahead of the national figure.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 493 occupations Washington reports figures for, this is number 242.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $74,030, tax leaves $60,910 — and because Washington is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $56,106 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $77,370, since top earners drag the number up.
  • For curators, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $74,030, ranking 10 of 49 and running about 16.73% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • In Washington's occupational distribution, curators sits at 242 of 493 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • After tax, $60,910 remains from the Washington median of $74,030 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $56,106 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $77,370 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Curators

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$45,720
Half earn under$74,030
Top tenth earn over$119,220
This salary$74,030

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$60,910
Take-home in Texas$60,910
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$6,575

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $74,030$65,142
$65,142in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$74,030
You could take a cut of−$8,888
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $74,030 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $45,720 and the ninetieth is $119,220 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Washington the take-home figure of $60,910, from $74,030, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 242 of 493 occupations here.
  • One number stands for prices across all of Washington, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $56,106, the adjusted value of that $74,030 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 242 of 493 in the state.
  • The Washington median of $74,030 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $45,720 to $119,220. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $60,910 from $74,030. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 242 of 493 locally.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Washington, so $56,106 — the adjusted value of that $74,030 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 242 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $77,370, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $45,720 at the bottom tenth to $119,220 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $56,106 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Less than people assume. $60,910 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 49 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $77,370. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($45,720) and the ninetieth ($119,220) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $56,106 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $60,910 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.