Data Scientists in District of Columbia

A computer workspace with headphones, a laptop and a small circuit board.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$89,939

after federal, FICA and District of Columbia tax

Tax takes

$36,551

28.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$81,169

District of Columbia costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$126,490

Kept after tax

$89,939

Worth in national money

$81,169

State rank

9

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • District of Columbia is one of the better-paying states for data scientists. The middle earner takes $126,490, which ranks 9 of 49 states with published figures. That is about 5.21% above the national middle.
  • This is one of the better-paid jobs in District of Columbia. It ranks 52 out of 390 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $126,490, tax leaves $89,939 — and because District of Columbia is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $81,169 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $142,580, since top earners drag the number up.
  • District of Columbia ranks 9 of 49 states publishing a median for data scientists, at $126,490 — about 5.21% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Within District of Columbia, data scientists ranks 52 of 390 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
  • After tax, $89,939 remains from the District of Columbia median of $126,490 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $81,169 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $142,580 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Data Scientists

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$89,750
Half earn under$126,490
Top tenth earn over$209,730
This salary$126,490

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$7,783take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in District of Columbia$89,939
Take-home in Texas$97,722
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$19,394

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $126,490$99,568
$99,568in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$115,293
You could take a cut of−$26,922
Prices in Texas97 vs 111

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Half the people doing this work in District of Columbia earn less than $126,490. The published range is $89,750 up to $209,730, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind District of Columbia's $89,939, worked from $126,490. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 52 of 390.
  • One number stands for prices across all of District of Columbia, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $81,169, the adjusted value of that $126,490 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 52 of 390 in the state.
  • Reported values are medians; for data scientists in District of Columbia the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $89,750 to $209,730. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
  • The District of Columbia take-home of $89,939, on $126,490 for work ranking 52 of 390 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 52 of 390 in the state.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for District of Columbia, so $81,169 — the adjusted value of that $126,490 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 52 of 390 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $142,580, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $89,750, the highest tenth $209,730, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. District of Columbia costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $81,169 rather than its face figure.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and District of Columbia adds its own income tax on top — which is why $89,939 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 49 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in District of Columbia is $142,580. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($89,750) and the ninetieth ($209,730) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

District of Columbia's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $81,169 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $89,939 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and District of Columbia income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.