Dietetic Technicians in Washington

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$39,945

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$7,056

15.0% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$36,794

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$47,000

Kept after tax

$39,945

Worth in national money

$36,794

State rank

5

of 45 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for dietetic technicians is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $47,000, putting the state 5 of 45 — about 24.87% ahead of the national figure.
  • Measured against other jobs in Washington, this one sits low: 426 of 493 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
  • Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $47,000 the take-home is $39,945; in national-average money that behaves like $36,794. The average comes to $50,530, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • For dietetic technicians, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $47,000, ranking 5 of 45 and running about 24.87% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Dietetic technicians occupies position 426 of 493 in Washington's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
  • Take-home for dietetic technicians in Washington, on $47,000, is $39,945; deflated by the state's price level, $36,794. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $50,530 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Dietetic Technicians

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$41,820
Half earn under$47,000
Top tenth earn over$62,030
This salary$47,000

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$39,945
Take-home in Texas$39,945
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,312

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $47,000$41,786
$41,786in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$47,000
You could take a cut of−$5,214
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $47,000 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $41,820 and the ninetieth is $62,030 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Washington the take-home figure of $39,945, from $47,000, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 426 of 493 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $36,794 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 426.
  • The Washington median of $47,000 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $41,820 to $62,030. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $39,945 from $47,000. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 426 of 493 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $36,794, worked from $47,000, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 426 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $50,530, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $41,820 and the top tenth $62,030, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

Not on its own. Prices in Washington run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $36,794 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $39,945 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 45 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $50,530. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($41,820 to $62,030) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $36,794 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $39,945 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.