Dietitians and Nutritionists in Massachusetts
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$59,247
after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax
Tax takes
$17,413
22.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$54,738
Massachusetts costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Massachusetts — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$76,660
Kept after tax
$59,247
Worth in national money
$54,738
State rank
16
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Massachusetts is one of the better-paying states for dietitians and nutritionists. The middle earner takes $76,660, which ranks 16 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 0.34% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Dietitians and nutritionists ranks 209 among 485 occupations Massachusetts publishes pay for.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $76,660, tax leaves $59,247 — and because Massachusetts is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $54,738 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $82,390, since top earners drag the number up.
- Massachusetts ranks 16 of 51 states publishing a median for dietitians and nutritionists, at $76,660 — about 0.34% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Position 209 of 485 in Massachusetts places dietitians and nutritionists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- After tax, $59,247 remains from the Massachusetts median of $76,660 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $54,738 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $82,390 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Dietitians and Nutritionists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $63,310 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $76,660 |
| Top tenth earn over | $107,150 |
| This salary | $76,660 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Massachusetts | $59,247 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $62,760 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$9,847 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $71,666 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$13,173 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 108 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $76,660 as a midpoint for Massachusetts, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $63,310 and the ninetieth is $107,150 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Massachusetts's $59,247, worked from $76,660. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 209 of 485.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $54,738 uses one figure for the whole of Massachusetts. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 485 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 209.
- The Massachusetts median of $76,660 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $63,310 to $107,150. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- The Massachusetts take-home of $59,247, on $76,660 for work ranking 209 of 485 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 209 of 485 in the state.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $54,738, worked from $76,660, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Massachusetts address, on work sitting at 209 of 485 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $82,390, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $63,310 at the bottom tenth to $107,150 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Massachusetts costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $54,738 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Massachusetts adds its own income tax on top — which is why $59,247 of this wage survives to your account.
Can I compare this job across every state?
This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $82,390. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($63,310 to $107,150) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Massachusetts rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $54,738 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $59,247 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.