Farmworkers, Farm, Ranch, and Aquacultural Animals in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$33,934
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$5,586
14.1% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$32,213
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$39,520
Kept after tax
$33,934
Worth in national money
$32,213
State rank
12
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $39,520, putting the state 12 of 49 — about 7.77% ahead of the national figure.
- Measured against other jobs in New Hampshire, this one sits low: 436 of 488 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $39,520, tax leaves $33,934 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $32,213 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $42,080, since top earners drag the number up.
- For farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $39,520, ranking 12 of 49 and running about 7.77% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals occupies position 436 of 488 in New Hampshire's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
- After tax, $33,934 remains from the New Hampshire median of $39,520 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $32,213 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $42,080 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Farmworkers, Farm, Ranch, and Aquacultural Animals
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $24,230 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $39,520 |
| Top tenth earn over | $60,650 |
| This salary | $39,520 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $33,934 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $33,934 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$2,708 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $39,520 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$3,275 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals in New Hampshire earn under $39,520 and half over. The published range runs $24,230 at the tenth percentile to $60,650 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $33,934, from $39,520, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 436 of 488 occupations here.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $32,213, the adjusted value of that $39,520 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 436 of 488 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $24,230 to $60,650; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $33,934 from $39,520. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 436 of 488 locally.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $32,213 — the adjusted value of that $39,520 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 436 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $42,080, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $24,230, the highest tenth $60,650, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $32,213 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $33,934 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 49 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $42,080. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($24,230) and the ninetieth ($60,650) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $32,213 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $33,934 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.