Farmworkers, Farm, Ranch, and Aquacultural Animals in Texas
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$29,435
after federal, FICA and Texas tax
Tax takes
$4,485
13.2% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$30,290
Texas costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Texas — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$33,920
Kept after tax
$29,435
Worth in national money
$30,290
State rank
37
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Texas is among the lower-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $33,920, ranking 37 of 49 states — about 7.5% below the national middle. Costs here are often lower too, which the figures further down account for.
- Measured against other jobs in Texas, this one sits low: 447 of 493 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
- Cost of living is unremarkable here. From $33,920, tax leaves $29,435, and adjusting for local prices barely moves it — about $30,290 in comparable terms. Averages run higher here, $35,960, since top earners drag the number up.
- Texas ranks 37 of 49 for farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals, with a median of $33,920 — about 7.5% below the national figure. A nominal shortfall is not by itself a real one: lower-paying states frequently carry lower tax and lower price levels, and the adjusted figures below are where that is settled rather than assumed.
- Farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals occupies position 447 of 493 in Texas's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
- Because Texas sits close to the national price level, the real-terms figure for farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals — median $33,920 — tracks the post-tax figure closely: $29,435 retained, $30,290 adjusted. ⚠️ Neither is a wage; the second describes what the first buys. Mean pay of $35,960 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Farmworkers, Farm, Ranch, and Aquacultural Animals
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $24,110 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $33,920 |
| Top tenth earn over | $50,480 |
| This salary | $33,920 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Texas | $29,435 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Florida | $29,435 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | −$1,838 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $33,920 |
|---|---|
| Raise you would need | +$2,366 |
| Prices in Florida | 103 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals in Texas earn under $33,920 and half over. The published range runs $24,110 at the tenth percentile to $50,480 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In Texas the take-home figure of $29,435, from $33,920, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 447 of 493 occupations here.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $30,290 uses one figure for the whole of Texas. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 447.
- Figures are distribution medians for farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacultural animals in Texas, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $24,110 to $50,480; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for Texas is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $29,435 from $33,920. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 447 of 493 locally.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $30,290, worked from $33,920, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Texas address, on work sitting at 447 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $35,960, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $24,110, the highest tenth $50,480, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $30,290.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $29,435 survives, because Texas levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 49 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Texas is $35,960. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($24,110) and the ninetieth ($50,480) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Texas's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $30,290 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Texas levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $29,435 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.