Financial and Investment Analysts in Vermont

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$74,110

after federal, FICA and Vermont tax

Tax takes

$24,980

25.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$76,691

Vermont costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$99,090

Kept after tax

$74,110

Worth in national money

$76,691

State rank

24

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Vermont sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $99,090, ranking 24 of 51 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Within Vermont this is well-paid work. Of 453 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 56 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • Cheaper living works in this state's favor. From $99,090 you keep $74,110 after tax, and local prices stretch that to the equivalent of $76,691 at national prices. Averages run higher here, $112,810, since top earners drag the number up.
  • Vermont occupies the middle band for financial and investment analysts: a median of $99,090, ranking 24 of 51. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Ranked against every occupation Vermont publishes a median for, financial and investment analysts sits 56 of 453 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • Retained pay in Vermont is $74,110 after the full tax stack, from $99,090. Because the state's price level runs below the national average, the price-adjusted equivalent is $76,691 — a real-terms figure describing purchasing power rather than compensation, and not a number that appears on any pay stub. Mean pay of $112,810 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Financial and Investment Analysts

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$68,710
Half earn under$99,090
Top tenth earn over$186,570
This salary$99,090

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$4,430take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Vermont$74,110
Take-home in Texas$78,540
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,132

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $99,090$93,382
$93,382in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$92,794
You could take a cut of−$5,708
Prices in Texas97 vs 97

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $99,090 as a midpoint for Vermont, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $68,710 and the ninetieth is $186,570 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Vermont the take-home figure of $74,110, from $99,090, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 56 of 453 occupations here.
  • One number stands for prices across all of Vermont, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $76,691, the adjusted value of that $99,090 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 56 of 453 in the state.
  • The Vermont median of $99,090 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $68,710 to $186,570. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Vermont is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $74,110 from $99,090. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 56 of 453 locally.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Vermont, so $76,691 — the adjusted value of that $99,090 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 56 of 453 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $112,810, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $68,710 at the bottom tenth to $186,570 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

More than the figure suggests. Prices in Vermont sit below the national level, so take-home here stretches like $76,691 would elsewhere. The wage is the same; the ground it covers is larger.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Vermont's own levy, $74,110 remains.

Can I compare this job across every state?

Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $112,810. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($68,710) and the ninetieth ($186,570) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $76,691 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $74,110 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.