Financial Examiners in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$65,680
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$15,130
18.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$62,347
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$80,810
Kept after tax
$65,680
Worth in national money
$62,347
State rank
31
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- New Hampshire sits in the middle of the pack for financial examiners. The median is $80,810, ranking 31 of 49 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 133.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $80,810 the take-home is $65,680. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $62,347 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $105,890, because the best-paid pull it up.
- New Hampshire occupies the middle band for financial examiners: a median of $80,810, ranking 31 of 49. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
- In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, financial examiners sits at 133 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $65,680 for financial examiners, from $80,810. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $62,347. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $105,890 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Financial Examiners
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $59,220 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $80,810 |
| Top tenth earn over | $203,840 |
| This salary | $80,810 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $65,680 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $65,680 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,242 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $80,810 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$7,241 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of financial examiners in New Hampshire earn under $80,810 and half over. The published range runs $59,220 at the tenth percentile to $203,840 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $65,680 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $80,810. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 133 of 488.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $62,347 uses one figure for the whole of New Hampshire. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 488 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 133.
- Figures are distribution medians for financial examiners in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $59,220 to $203,840; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $65,680, from $80,810, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 133 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 31 of 49 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $62,347, worked from $80,810, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular New Hampshire address, on work sitting at 133 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $105,890 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $59,220 at the bottom tenth to $203,840 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $62,347 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $65,680 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 49 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $105,890. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($59,220) and the ninetieth ($203,840) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,347 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $65,680 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.