Financial Managers in Vermont
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$92,829
after federal, FICA and Vermont tax
Tax takes
$35,861
27.9% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$96,062
Vermont costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Vermont — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$128,690
Kept after tax
$92,829
Worth in national money
$96,062
State rank
44
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for financial managers is on the low side in Vermont. The middle earner gets $128,690. That is 44 of 51 states, and about 22.74% under the national figure. Whether that matters depends on what things cost here.
- Locally, this pays well. Among 453 occupations Vermont reports, financial managers comes in at 21 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
- Vermont is cheaper than average, and that shows up here. From $128,690 the take-home is $92,829; adjusted for what things actually cost, it goes as far as $96,062 would nationally. The average comes to $146,120, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- For financial managers, Vermont sits in the lower band at $128,690, ranking 44 of 51 and trailing the national median by about 22.74%. Nominal rankings routinely invert once tax and regional price level are applied, so this position should not be read as the conclusion.
- Financial managers ranks 21 of 453 occupations by median in Vermont, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
- Post-tax income for financial managers in Vermont, on $128,690, is $92,829 — equivalent to $96,062 once regional price parity is applied. ⚠️ The adjustment uses a statewide index that describes no particular address; within-state price variation, concentrated in housing, routinely exceeds the difference between two states. At $146,120 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Financial Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $81,230 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $128,690 |
| Top tenth earn over | $220,750 |
| This salary | $128,690 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Vermont | $92,829 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $99,226 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,049 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $119,402 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$8,551 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Vermont earn less than $128,690. The published range is $81,230 up to $220,750, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- In Vermont the take-home figure of $92,829, from $128,690, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 21 of 453 occupations here.
- One number stands for prices across all of Vermont, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $96,062, the adjusted value of that $128,690 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 21 of 453 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for financial managers in Vermont the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $81,230 to $220,750. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Take-home for Vermont is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $92,829 from $128,690. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 21 of 453 locally.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Vermont, so $96,062 — the adjusted value of that $128,690 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 21 of 453 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $146,120, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $81,230 at the bottom tenth to $220,750 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $96,062.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Vermont's own levy, $92,829 remains.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $146,120. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($81,230) and the ninetieth ($220,750) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $96,062 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $92,829 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.