First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers in California
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$72,556
after federal, FICA and California tax
Tax takes
$25,124
25.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$64,448
California costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in California — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$97,680
Kept after tax
$72,556
Worth in national money
$64,448
State rank
9
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- California is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $97,680, which ranks 9 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 22.22% above the national middle.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 492 occupations California reports figures for, this is number 141.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $97,680 the take-home is $72,556. But California costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $64,448 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $103,760, because the best-paid pull it up.
- California ranks 9 of 51 states publishing a median for first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers, at $97,680 — about 22.22% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- In California's occupational distribution, first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers sits at 141 of 492 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and California income tax is $72,556 for first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers, from $97,680. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $64,448. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $103,760 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $60,690 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $97,680 |
| Top tenth earn over | $156,530 |
| This salary | $97,680 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in California | $72,556 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $77,548 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$15,355 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $90,584 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$21,210 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 113 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers in California earn under $97,680 and half over. The published range runs $60,690 at the tenth percentile to $156,530 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $72,556 take-home in California comes from $97,680. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 141 of 492.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $64,448 uses one figure for the whole of California. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 492 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 141.
- Figures are distribution medians for first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers in California, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $60,690 to $156,530; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $72,556, from $97,680, assumes a single California filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 141 of 492 locally, and the state ranks 9 of 51 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $64,448, worked from $97,680, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular California address, on work sitting at 141 of 492 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $103,760, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $60,690 at the bottom tenth to $156,530 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. California costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $64,448 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; California then takes its own share, leaving $72,556.
Can I compare this job across every state?
All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in California is $103,760. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($60,690) and the ninetieth ($156,530) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
California's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $64,448 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $72,556 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and California income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.