General and Operations Managers in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$96,485
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$28,195
22.6% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$91,589
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$124,680
Kept after tax
$96,485
Worth in national money
$91,589
State rank
10
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $124,680, putting the state 10 of 51 — about 17.88% ahead of the national figure.
- This is one of the better-paid jobs in New Hampshire. It ranks 39 out of 488 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $124,680 the take-home is $96,485. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $91,589 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $146,910, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For general and operations managers, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $124,680, ranking 10 of 51 and running about 17.88% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Within New Hampshire, general and operations managers ranks 39 of 488 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $96,485 for general and operations managers, from $124,680. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $91,589. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $146,910 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: General and Operations Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $61,100 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $124,680 |
| Top tenth earn over | $264,270 |
| This salary | $124,680 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $96,485 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $96,485 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$7,700 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $124,680 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$10,718 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $124,680. The published range is $61,100 up to $264,270, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $96,485 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $124,680. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 39 of 488.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $91,589 uses one figure for the whole of New Hampshire. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 488 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 39.
- Reported values are medians; for general and operations managers in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $61,100 to $264,270. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $96,485, from $124,680, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 39 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 10 of 51 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $91,589, worked from $124,680, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular New Hampshire address, on work sitting at 39 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $146,910, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $61,100, the highest tenth $264,270, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $91,589 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $96,485 of this wage reaches your account, because New Hampshire takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Can I compare this job across every state?
All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $146,910. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($61,100) and the ninetieth ($264,270) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $91,589 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $96,485 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.