Glaziers in Washington

A hard hat, safety glasses and tool belt beside timber house framing.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$55,866

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$10,994

16.4% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$51,460

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$66,860

Kept after tax

$55,866

Worth in national money

$51,460

State rank

6

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Washington is one of the better-paying states for glaziers. The middle earner takes $66,860, which ranks 6 of 50 states with published figures. That is about 17.13% above the national middle.
  • Against other work in Washington, this sits in the middle: 263 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $66,860 the take-home is $55,866. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $51,460 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $80,230, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Washington ranks 6 of 50 states publishing a median for glaziers, at $66,860 — about 17.13% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Glaziers ranks 263 of 493 occupations in Washington by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $55,866 for glaziers, from $66,860. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $51,460. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $80,230 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Glaziers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$46,650
Half earn under$66,860
Top tenth earn over$131,280
This salary$66,860

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$55,866
Take-home in Texas$55,866
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$6,030

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $66,860$59,522
$59,522in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$66,860
You could take a cut of−$7,338
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of glaziers in Washington earn under $66,860 and half over. The published range runs $46,650 at the tenth percentile to $131,280 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Washington's $55,866, worked from $66,860. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 263 of 493.
  • Two cautions on $51,460, the adjusted value of that $66,860 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 263 of 493 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for glaziers in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $46,650 to $131,280; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Washington take-home of $55,866, on $66,860 for work ranking 263 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 263 of 493 in the state.
  • This $51,460 adjusted figure, worked from $66,860, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 263 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 263 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $80,230 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $46,650, the highest tenth $131,280, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $51,460 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $55,866 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 50 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $80,230. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($46,650) and the ninetieth ($131,280) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $51,460 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $55,866 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.