Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Workers, All Other in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$65,624
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$15,106
18.7% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$60,448
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$80,730
Kept after tax
$65,624
Worth in national money
$60,448
State rank
7
of 49 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. Washington pays this job a middle wage of $80,730, ranking 7 of 49 states and sitting about 22.71% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 187 among 493 occupations Washington publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $80,730 the take-home is $65,624. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $60,448 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $91,610, because the best-paid pull it up.
- Washington's median for healthcare practitioners and technical workers, all other is $80,730, about 22.71% above the national figure and 7 of 49 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Position 187 of 493 in Washington places healthcare practitioners and technical workers, all other in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $65,624 for healthcare practitioners and technical workers, all other, from $80,730. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $60,448. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $91,610 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Workers, All Other
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $60,880 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $80,730 |
| Top tenth earn over | $138,180 |
| This salary | $80,730 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $65,624 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $65,624 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$7,083 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $80,730 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$9,784 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Washington earn less than $80,730. The published range is $60,880 up to $138,180, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- In Washington the take-home figure of $65,624, from $80,730, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 187 of 493 occupations here.
- Two cautions on $60,448, the adjusted value of that $80,730 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 187 of 493 locally.
- Reported values are medians; for healthcare practitioners and technical workers, all other in Washington the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $60,880 to $138,180. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $65,624 from $80,730. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 187 of 493 locally.
- This $60,448 adjusted figure, worked from $80,730, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 187 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 187 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $91,610, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $60,880 and the top tenth $138,180 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $60,448 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $65,624 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 49 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $91,610. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($60,880) and the ninetieth ($138,180) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $60,448 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $65,624 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.