History Teachers, Postsecondary in New Hampshire

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$84,020
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$22,860
21.4% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$79,757
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$106,880
Kept after tax
$84,020
Worth in national money
$79,757
State rank
2
of 45 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. New Hampshire pays this job a middle wage of $106,880, ranking 2 of 45 states and sitting about 27.51% above the national middle.
- This is one of the better-paid jobs in New Hampshire. It ranks 48 out of 488 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $106,880 the take-home is $84,020. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $79,757 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $116,670, because the best-paid pull it up.
- New Hampshire's median for history teachers, postsecondary is $106,880, about 27.51% above the national figure and 2 of 45 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Within New Hampshire, history teachers, postsecondary ranks 48 of 488 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $84,020 for history teachers, postsecondary, from $106,880. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $79,757. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $116,670 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: History Teachers, Postsecondary
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $53,670 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $106,880 |
| Top tenth earn over | $165,270 |
| This salary | $106,880 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $84,020 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $84,020 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,706 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $106,880 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$9,262 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $106,880. The published range is $53,670 up to $165,270, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $84,020 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $106,880. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 48 of 488.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $79,757, the adjusted value of that $106,880 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 48 of 488 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for history teachers, postsecondary in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $53,670 to $165,270. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $84,020, from $106,880, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 48 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 2 of 45 for it.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $79,757 — the adjusted value of that $106,880 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 48 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $116,670, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $53,670, the highest tenth $165,270, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $79,757 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $84,020 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 45 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $116,670. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($53,670) and the ninetieth ($165,270) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $79,757 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $84,020 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.