Industrial Production Managers in Idaho

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$79,508

after federal, FICA and Idaho tax

Tax takes

$27,832

25.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$86,965

Idaho costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$107,340

Kept after tax

$79,508

Worth in national money

$86,965

State rank

48

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • The nominal figure here is modest. Idaho pays industrial production managers a middle wage of $107,340, 48 of 50 states and about 14.85% below the national middle. Hold that thought until the adjusted numbers.
  • Within Idaho this is well-paid work. Of 476 occupations with published figures in the state, industrial production managers ranks 33 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
  • Idaho is cheaper than average, and that shows up here. From $107,340 the take-home is $79,508; adjusted for what things actually cost, it goes as far as $86,965 would nationally. The average comes to $116,970, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Idaho's $107,340 median for industrial production managers places it 48 of 50 states, about 14.85% below national. Because both the tax and price adjustments tend to favor lower-nominal states, this ranking is the least stable of the three reported here.
  • Ranked against every occupation Idaho publishes a median for, industrial production managers sits 33 of 476 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
  • Post-tax income for industrial production managers in Idaho, on $107,340, is $79,508 — equivalent to $86,965 once regional price parity is applied. ⚠️ The adjustment uses a statewide index that describes no particular address; within-state price variation, concentrated in housing, routinely exceeds the difference between two states. At $116,970 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Industrial Production Managers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$69,100
Half earn under$107,340
Top tenth earn over$175,140
This salary$107,340

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$4,836take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Idaho$79,508
Take-home in Texas$84,344
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$170

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$107,574
$107,574in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$100,466
Raise you would need+$234
Prices in Texas97 vs 91

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of industrial production managers in Idaho earn under $107,340 and half over. The published range runs $69,100 at the tenth percentile to $175,140 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • That $79,508 take-home in Idaho comes from $107,340. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 33 of 476.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $86,965 uses one figure for the whole of Idaho. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 476 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 33.
  • Figures are distribution medians for industrial production managers in Idaho, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $69,100 to $175,140; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Retained pay of $79,508, from $107,340, assumes a single Idaho filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 33 of 476 locally, and the state ranks 48 of 50 for it.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $86,965, worked from $107,340, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Idaho address, on work sitting at 33 of 476 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $116,970 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $69,100 and the top tenth $175,140 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $86,965.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Idaho's own levy, $79,508 remains.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Idaho is $116,970. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($69,100) and the ninetieth ($175,140) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Idaho's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $86,965 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $79,508 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Idaho income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.