Instructional Coordinators in New Hampshire

Books, colored pencils and a globe in a bright classroom.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$65,961

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$15,249

18.8% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$62,614

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$81,210

Kept after tax

$65,961

Worth in national money

$62,614

State rank

13

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • New Hampshire is one of the better-paying states for instructional coordinators. The middle earner takes $81,210, which ranks 13 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 4.87% above the national middle.
  • Against other work in New Hampshire, this sits in the middle: 126 of 488 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • Costs eat into it here. Of $81,210, tax leaves $65,961 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $62,614 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $81,450, since top earners drag the number up.
  • New Hampshire ranks 13 of 51 states publishing a median for instructional coordinators, at $81,210 — about 4.87% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Instructional coordinators ranks 126 of 488 occupations in New Hampshire by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • After tax, $65,961 remains from the New Hampshire median of $81,210 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $62,614 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $81,450 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Instructional Coordinators

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$45,790
Half earn under$81,210
Top tenth earn over$115,940
This salary$81,210

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$65,961
Take-home in Texas$65,961
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$5,264

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $81,210$73,938
$73,938in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$81,210
You could take a cut of−$7,272
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of instructional coordinators in New Hampshire earn under $81,210 and half over. The published range runs $45,790 at the tenth percentile to $115,940 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind New Hampshire's $65,961, worked from $81,210. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 126 of 488.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $62,614 uses one figure for the whole of New Hampshire. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 488 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 126.
  • Figures are distribution medians for instructional coordinators in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $45,790 to $115,940; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The New Hampshire take-home of $65,961, on $81,210 for work ranking 126 of 488 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 126 of 488 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $62,614, worked from $81,210, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular New Hampshire address, on work sitting at 126 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $45,790, the highest tenth $115,940, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $62,614 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

Most of it arrives. $65,961 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($45,790) and the ninetieth ($115,940) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,614 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $65,961 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.