Interpreters and Translators in Connecticut

A camera, paintbrushes and fabric swatches on a creative studio table.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$53,898

after federal, FICA and Connecticut tax

Tax takes

$14,442

21.1% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$51,981

Connecticut costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$68,340

Kept after tax

$53,898

Worth in national money

$51,981

State rank

8

of 47 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for interpreters and translators is strong here. Connecticut's middle earner gets $68,340, putting the state 8 of 47 — about 13.58% ahead of the national figure.
  • Against other work in Connecticut, this sits in the middle: 226 of 482 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $68,340 the take-home is $53,898. But Connecticut costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $51,981 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $77,750, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For interpreters and translators, Connecticut sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $68,340, ranking 8 of 47 and running about 13.58% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Interpreters and translators ranks 226 of 482 occupations in Connecticut by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Connecticut income tax is $53,898 for interpreters and translators, from $68,340. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $51,981. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $77,750 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Interpreters and Translators

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$40,840
Half earn under$68,340
Top tenth earn over$128,760
This salary$68,340

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$3,009take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Connecticut$53,898
Take-home in Texas$56,907
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$6,581

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $68,340$60,152
$60,152in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$64,367
You could take a cut of−$8,188
Prices in Texas97 vs 104

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Half the people doing this work in Connecticut earn less than $68,340. The published range is $40,840 up to $128,760, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
  • That $53,898 take-home in Connecticut comes from $68,340. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 226 of 482.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $51,981 uses one figure for the whole of Connecticut. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 482 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 226.
  • Reported values are medians; for interpreters and translators in Connecticut the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $40,840 to $128,760. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
  • Retained pay of $53,898, from $68,340, assumes a single Connecticut filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 226 of 482 locally, and the state ranks 8 of 47 for it.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $51,981, worked from $68,340, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Connecticut address, on work sitting at 226 of 482 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $77,750, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $40,840 and the top tenth $128,760 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Connecticut costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $51,981 rather than its face figure.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Connecticut adds its own income tax on top — which is why $53,898 of this wage survives to your account.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 47 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Connecticut is $77,750. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($40,840) and the ninetieth ($128,760) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Connecticut's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $51,981 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $53,898 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Connecticut income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 47 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.