Interviewers, Except Eligibility and Loan in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$41,463
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$7,427
15.2% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$39,359
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$48,890
Kept after tax
$41,463
Worth in national money
$39,359
State rank
12
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $48,890, putting the state 12 of 50 — about 6.47% ahead of the national figure.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 488 occupations New Hampshire reports figures for, this is number 357.
- New Hampshire is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $48,890 the take-home is $41,463; in national-average money that behaves like $39,359. The average comes to $50,260, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- For interviewers, except eligibility and loan, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $48,890, ranking 12 of 50 and running about 6.47% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- In New Hampshire's occupational distribution, interviewers, except eligibility and loan sits at 357 of 488 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- Take-home for interviewers, except eligibility and loan in New Hampshire, on $48,890, is $41,463; deflated by the state's price level, $39,359. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $50,260 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Interviewers, Except Eligibility and Loan
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $37,010 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $48,890 |
| Top tenth earn over | $71,410 |
| This salary | $48,890 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $41,463 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $41,463 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$3,309 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $48,890 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$4,002 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $48,890 as a midpoint for New Hampshire, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $37,010 and the ninetieth is $71,410 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind New Hampshire's $41,463, worked from $48,890. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 357 of 488.
- Two cautions on $39,359, the adjusted value of that $48,890 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 357 of 488 locally.
- The New Hampshire median of $48,890 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $37,010 to $71,410. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- The New Hampshire take-home of $41,463, on $48,890 for work ranking 357 of 488 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 357 of 488 in the state.
- This $39,359 adjusted figure, worked from $48,890, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 357 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 357 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $37,010 at the tenth percentile, $71,410 at the ninetieth.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $39,359 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $41,463 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Why is this job missing from some states?
Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($37,010 to $71,410) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $39,359 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $41,463 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.