Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses in District of Columbia
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$58,636
after federal, FICA and District of Columbia tax
Tax takes
$17,104
22.6% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$52,919
District of Columbia costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in District of Columbia — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$75,740
Kept after tax
$58,636
Worth in national money
$52,919
State rank
10
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- District of Columbia is one of the better-paying states for this job. The middle earner takes $75,740, which ranks 10 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 17.61% above the national middle.
- Middle of the local pack. Of 390 occupations District of Columbia reports figures for, this is number 214.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $75,740, tax leaves $58,636 — and because District of Columbia is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $52,919 would nationally. Here the average runs under the middle, at $74,030.
- District of Columbia ranks 10 of 51 states publishing a median for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses, at $75,740 — about 17.61% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- In District of Columbia's occupational distribution, licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses sits at 214 of 390 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
- After tax, $58,636 remains from the District of Columbia median of $75,740 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $52,919 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $74,030 sits under the median, so the lower tail is the longer one.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $62,880 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $75,740 |
| Top tenth earn over | $87,470 |
| This salary | $75,740 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in District of Columbia | $58,636 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $62,113 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$11,000 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $70,798 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$14,453 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 111 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses in District of Columbia earn under $75,740 and half over. The published range runs $62,880 at the tenth percentile to $87,470 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $58,636 take-home in District of Columbia comes from $75,740. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 214 of 390.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $52,919 uses one figure for the whole of District of Columbia. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 390 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 214.
- Figures are distribution medians for licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses in District of Columbia, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $62,880 to $87,470; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $58,636, from $75,740, assumes a single District of Columbia filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 214 of 390 locally, and the state ranks 10 of 51 for it.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $52,919, worked from $75,740, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular District of Columbia address, on work sitting at 214 of 390 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $62,880 at the bottom tenth to $87,470 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $52,919 of national purchasing power.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; District of Columbia then takes its own share, leaving $58,636.
Can I compare this job across every state?
All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($62,880 to $87,470) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to District of Columbia rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
District of Columbia's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $52,919 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $58,636 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and District of Columbia income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.