Lodging Managers in Vermont
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$62,858
after federal, FICA and Vermont tax
Tax takes
$18,582
22.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$65,047
Vermont costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Vermont — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$81,440
Kept after tax
$62,858
Worth in national money
$65,047
State rank
7
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Vermont is one of the better-paying states for lodging managers. The middle earner takes $81,440, which ranks 7 of 51 states with published figures. That is about 17.6% above the national middle.
- Within Vermont this is well-paid work. Of 453 occupations with published figures in the state, lodging managers ranks 109 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Cheaper living works in this state's favor. From $81,440 you keep $62,858 after tax, and local prices stretch that to the equivalent of $65,047 at national prices. Averages run higher here, $86,450, since top earners drag the number up.
- Vermont ranks 7 of 51 states publishing a median for lodging managers, at $81,440 — about 17.6% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Ranked against every occupation Vermont publishes a median for, lodging managers sits 109 of 453 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Retained pay in Vermont is $62,858 after the full tax stack, from $81,440. Because the state's price level runs below the national average, the price-adjusted equivalent is $65,047 — a real-terms figure describing purchasing power rather than compensation, and not a number that appears on any pay stub. Mean pay of $86,450 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Lodging Managers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $48,860 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $81,440 |
| Top tenth earn over | $121,230 |
| This salary | $81,440 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Vermont | $62,858 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $66,123 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$2,998 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $76,799 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$4,141 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Treat $81,440 as a midpoint for Vermont, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $48,860 and the ninetieth is $121,230 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
- In Vermont the take-home figure of $62,858, from $81,440, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 109 of 453 occupations here.
- Two cautions on $65,047, the adjusted value of that $81,440 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Vermont. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 109 of 453 locally.
- The Vermont median of $81,440 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $48,860 to $121,230. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
- Take-home for Vermont is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $62,858 from $81,440. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 109 of 453 locally.
- This $65,047 adjusted figure, worked from $81,440, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 109 of 453 in the state. The occupation ranks 109 of 453 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $86,450, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $48,860 and the top tenth $121,230 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $65,047.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Vermont then takes its own share, leaving $62,858.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $86,450. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($48,860) and the ninetieth ($121,230) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $65,047 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $62,858 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.