Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists in District of Columbia

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$91,267

after federal, FICA and District of Columbia tax

Tax takes

$37,443

29.1% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$82,368

District of Columbia costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$128,710

Kept after tax

$91,267

Worth in national money

$82,368

State rank

1

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for this job is strong here. District of Columbia's middle earner gets $128,710, putting the state 1 of 51 — about 34.8% ahead of the national figure.
  • Locally, this pays well. Among 390 occupations District of Columbia reports, this job comes in at 47 — comfortably in the upper quarter.
  • District of Columbia is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $128,710 the take-home is $91,267; in national-average money that behaves like $82,368. The average lands at $116,600, below the middle of the range.
  • For magnetic resonance imaging technologists, District of Columbia sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $128,710, ranking 1 of 51 and running about 34.8% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging technologists ranks 47 of 390 occupations by median in District of Columbia, in the top quartile. Within-state position is largely independent of national position, so this holds regardless of how the state compares to others for the same work.
  • Take-home for magnetic resonance imaging technologists in District of Columbia, on $128,710, is $91,267; deflated by the state's price level, $82,368. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $116,600 the mean undershoots the median, an inversion of the usual skew.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$89,120
Half earn under$128,710
Top tenth earn over$134,950
This salary$128,710

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$7,972take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in District of Columbia$91,267
Take-home in Texas$99,239
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$19,756

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $128,710$101,225
$101,225in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$117,182
You could take a cut of−$27,485
Prices in Texas97 vs 111

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Half the people doing this work in District of Columbia earn less than $128,710. The published range is $89,120 up to $134,950, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind District of Columbia's $91,267, worked from $128,710. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 47 of 390.
  • One number stands for prices across all of District of Columbia, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $82,368, the adjusted value of that $128,710 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 47 of 390 in the state.
  • Reported values are medians; for magnetic resonance imaging technologists in District of Columbia the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $89,120 to $134,950. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
  • The District of Columbia take-home of $91,267, on $128,710 for work ranking 47 of 390 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 47 of 390 in the state.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for District of Columbia, so $82,368 — the adjusted value of that $128,710 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 47 of 390 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $116,600, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $89,120 and the top tenth $134,950, so most people doing this work in District of Columbia sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $82,368 of national purchasing power.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; District of Columbia then takes its own share, leaving $91,267.

Can I compare this job across every state?

All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in District of Columbia is $116,600. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($89,120 to $134,950) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to District of Columbia rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

District of Columbia's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $82,368 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $91,267 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and District of Columbia income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.