Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists in Vermont
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$76,648
after federal, FICA and Vermont tax
Tax takes
$26,422
25.6% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$79,317
Vermont costs less than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Vermont — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$103,070
Kept after tax
$76,648
Worth in national money
$79,317
State rank
16
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. Vermont's middle earner gets $103,070, putting the state 16 of 51 — about 7.95% ahead of the national figure.
- Within Vermont this is well-paid work. Of 453 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 48 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Cheaper living works in this state's favor. From $103,070 you keep $76,648 after tax, and local prices stretch that to the equivalent of $79,317 at national prices. Averages run higher here, $107,170, since top earners drag the number up.
- For magnetic resonance imaging technologists, Vermont sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $103,070, ranking 16 of 51 and running about 7.95% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Ranked against every occupation Vermont publishes a median for, magnetic resonance imaging technologists sits 48 of 453 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Retained pay in Vermont is $76,648 after the full tax stack, from $103,070. Because the state's price level runs below the national average, the price-adjusted equivalent is $79,317 — a real-terms figure describing purchasing power rather than compensation, and not a number that appears on any pay stub. Mean pay of $107,170 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $83,340 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $103,070 |
| Top tenth earn over | $132,270 |
| This salary | $103,070 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Vermont | $76,648 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $81,340 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$4,388 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $96,400 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$6,061 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 97 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Vermont earn less than $103,070. The published range is $83,340 up to $132,270, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Vermont's $76,648, worked from $103,070. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 48 of 453.
- One number stands for prices across all of Vermont, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $79,317, the adjusted value of that $103,070 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 48 of 453 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for magnetic resonance imaging technologists in Vermont the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $83,340 to $132,270. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- The Vermont take-home of $76,648, on $103,070 for work ranking 48 of 453 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 48 of 453 in the state.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Vermont, so $79,317 — the adjusted value of that $103,070 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 48 of 453 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $107,170, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
The range here is narrow. From $83,340 at the bottom tenth to $132,270 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.
What does this pay actually buy where I live?
A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $79,317.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Vermont's own levy, $76,648 remains.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Vermont is $107,170. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($83,340 to $132,270) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Vermont rather than a national figure.
What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?
Vermont's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $79,317 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $76,648 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Vermont income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.