Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary in Connecticut
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$64,715
after federal, FICA and Connecticut tax
Tax takes
$20,305
23.9% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$62,413
Connecticut costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Connecticut — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$85,020
Kept after tax
$64,715
Worth in national money
$62,413
State rank
11
of 48 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. Connecticut's middle earner gets $85,020, putting the state 11 of 48 — about 6.35% ahead of the national figure.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 137 among 482 occupations Connecticut publishes pay for.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $85,020 the take-home is $64,715. But Connecticut costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $62,413 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $98,040, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For mathematical science teachers, postsecondary, Connecticut sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $85,020, ranking 11 of 48 and running about 6.35% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Position 137 of 482 in Connecticut places mathematical science teachers, postsecondary in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Connecticut income tax is $64,715 for mathematical science teachers, postsecondary, from $85,020. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $62,413. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $98,040 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Mathematical Science Teachers, Postsecondary
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $58,960 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $85,020 |
| Top tenth earn over | $160,520 |
| This salary | $85,020 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Connecticut | $64,715 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $68,642 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$8,224 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $79,439 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$11,360 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 104 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of mathematical science teachers, postsecondary in Connecticut earn under $85,020 and half over. The published range runs $58,960 at the tenth percentile to $160,520 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Connecticut's $64,715, worked from $85,020. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 137 of 482.
- The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $62,413 uses one figure for the whole of Connecticut. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 482 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 137.
- Figures are distribution medians for mathematical science teachers, postsecondary in Connecticut, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $58,960 to $160,520; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- The Connecticut take-home of $64,715, on $85,020 for work ranking 137 of 482 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 137 of 482 in the state.
- Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $62,413, worked from $85,020, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Connecticut address, on work sitting at 137 of 482 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $98,040, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $58,960 and the top tenth $160,520 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $62,413 of national purchasing power.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Connecticut adds its own income tax on top — which is why $64,715 of this wage survives to your account.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 48 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Connecticut is $98,040. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($58,960) and the ninetieth ($160,520) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Connecticut's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $62,413 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $64,715 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Connecticut income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.