Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers in Virginia

Two armchairs facing each other in a welcoming counseling room.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$50,864

after federal, FICA and Virginia tax

Tax takes

$13,376

20.8% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$50,486

Virginia costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$64,240

Kept after tax

$50,864

Worth in national money

$50,486

State rank

13

of 51 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Pay for this job is strong here. Virginia's middle earner gets $64,240, putting the state 13 of 51 — about 6.57% ahead of the national figure.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 489 occupations Virginia reports figures for, this is number 199.
  • Prices here sit close to the national average, so the adjustment changes little. From $64,240 the take-home is $50,864, which is worth about $50,486 in comparable money. Tax does most of the work here, not cost of living. The average is higher, $72,020, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • For mental health and substance abuse social workers, Virginia sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $64,240, ranking 13 of 51 and running about 6.57% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
  • In Virginia's occupational distribution, mental health and substance abuse social workers sits at 199 of 489 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • Virginia's price level is near the national average, so price deflation is close to neutral for mental health and substance abuse social workers on its $64,240 median: $50,864 retained after tax becomes $50,486 in national-average terms. Where the price adjustment is small, the tax stack is the dominant determinant of the real outcome. The mean of $72,020 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Social Workers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$48,530
Half earn under$64,240
Top tenth earn over$102,480
This salary$64,240

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$2,933take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Virginia$50,864
Take-home in Texas$53,797
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$4,875

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $64,240$58,344
$58,344in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$60,590
You could take a cut of−$5,896
Prices in Texas97 vs 101

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of mental health and substance abuse social workers in Virginia earn under $64,240 and half over. The published range runs $48,530 at the tenth percentile to $102,480 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Virginia's $50,864, worked from $64,240. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 199 of 489.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $50,486 uses one figure for the whole of Virginia. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 489 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 199.
  • Figures are distribution medians for mental health and substance abuse social workers in Virginia, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $48,530 to $102,480; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Virginia take-home of $50,864, on $64,240 for work ranking 199 of 489 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 199 of 489 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $50,486, worked from $64,240, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Virginia address, on work sitting at 199 of 489 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $72,020 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $48,530 at the bottom tenth to $102,480 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $50,486 of national purchasing power.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Into four separate taxes, not one. Federal income tax, Social Security and Medicare apply everywhere, and Virginia adds its own income tax on top — which is why $50,864 of this wage survives to your account.

Can I compare this job across every state?

This occupation is published everywhere — all 51 of them — so comparing states measures real differences rather than gaps in the data.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Virginia is $72,020. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($48,530) and the ninetieth ($102,480) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Virginia's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $50,486 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $50,864 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Virginia income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Is this occupation's state coverage complete?

State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.