Morticians, Undertakers, and Funeral Arrangers in Connecticut

A small group standing together at a graveside on an overcast morning.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$47,623

after federal, FICA and Connecticut tax

Tax takes

$12,087

20.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$45,929

Connecticut costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$59,710

Kept after tax

$47,623

Worth in national money

$45,929

State rank

17

of 48 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Neither high nor low. Connecticut is 17 of 48 states for this job, with a middle wage of $59,710. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
  • Middle of the local pack. Of 482 occupations Connecticut reports figures for, this is number 291.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $59,710 the take-home is $47,623. But Connecticut costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $45,929 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $65,810, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Connecticut ranks 17 of 48 for morticians, undertakers, and funeral arrangers at $59,710. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
  • In Connecticut's occupational distribution, morticians, undertakers, and funeral arrangers sits at 291 of 482 — neither quartile. This local position is what a resident compares against, and it is determined by the state's own labor market rather than by national patterns for this occupation.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Connecticut income tax is $47,623 for morticians, undertakers, and funeral arrangers, from $59,710. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $45,929. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $65,810 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Morticians, Undertakers, and Funeral Arrangers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$34,010
Half earn under$59,710
Top tenth earn over$94,620
This salary$59,710

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$2,534take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Connecticut$47,623
Take-home in Texas$50,157
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$5,686

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $59,710$52,833
$52,833in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$56,556
You could take a cut of−$6,877
Prices in Texas97 vs 104

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of morticians, undertakers, and funeral arrangers in Connecticut earn under $59,710 and half over. The published range runs $34,010 at the tenth percentile to $94,620 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Connecticut's $47,623, worked from $59,710. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 291 of 482.
  • Two cautions on $45,929, the adjusted value of that $59,710 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Connecticut. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 291 of 482 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for morticians, undertakers, and funeral arrangers in Connecticut, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $34,010 to $94,620; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Connecticut take-home of $47,623, on $59,710 for work ranking 291 of 482 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 291 of 482 in the state.
  • This $45,929 adjusted figure, worked from $59,710, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 291 of 482 in the state. The occupation ranks 291 of 482 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $65,810, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

The label is broader than the work. From $34,010 at the bottom tenth to $94,620 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Connecticut costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $45,929 rather than its face figure.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Connecticut then takes its own share, leaving $47,623.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 48 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Connecticut is $65,810. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($34,010) and the ninetieth ($94,620) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Connecticut's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $45,929 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $47,623 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Connecticut income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.