News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists in Texas

A camera, paintbrushes and fabric swatches on a creative studio table.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$41,126

after federal, FICA and Texas tax

Tax takes

$7,344

15.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$42,321

Texas costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$48,470

Kept after tax

$41,126

Worth in national money

$42,321

State rank

26

of 48 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Texas sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $48,470, ranking 26 of 48 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Ordinary, locally speaking. This job ranks 292 among 493 occupations Texas publishes pay for.
  • Prices here sit close to the national average, so the adjustment changes little. From $48,470 the take-home is $41,126, which is worth about $42,321 in comparable money. Tax does most of the work here, not cost of living. The average is higher, $63,390, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Texas occupies the middle band for news analysts, reporters, and journalists: a median of $48,470, ranking 26 of 48. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Position 292 of 493 in Texas places news analysts, reporters, and journalists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
  • Texas's price level is near the national average, so price deflation is close to neutral for news analysts, reporters, and journalists on its $48,470 median: $41,126 retained after tax becomes $42,321 in national-average terms. Where the price adjustment is small, the tax stack is the dominant determinant of the real outcome. The mean of $63,390 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$28,990
Half earn under$48,470
Top tenth earn over$95,830
This salary$48,470

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Florida
Take-home in Texas$41,126
Take-home in Florida$41,126
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$2,568

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$51,776
$51,776in Florida, for the same life
To match take-home only$48,470
Raise you would need+$3,306
Prices in Florida103 vs 97

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of news analysts, reporters, and journalists in Texas earn under $48,470 and half over. The published range runs $28,990 at the tenth percentile to $95,830 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Texas's $41,126, worked from $48,470. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 292 of 493.
  • One number stands for prices across all of Texas, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $42,321, the adjusted value of that $48,470 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 292 of 493 in the state.
  • Figures are distribution medians for news analysts, reporters, and journalists in Texas, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $28,990 to $95,830; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • The Texas take-home of $41,126, on $48,470 for work ranking 292 of 493 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 292 of 493 in the state.
  • Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Texas, so $42,321 — the adjusted value of that $48,470 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 292 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $63,390, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $28,990 and the top tenth $95,830 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

A smaller wage in a cheaper place is not automatically less. Adjusted for local prices, this is worth $42,321.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $41,126 survives, because Texas levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 48 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Texas is $63,390. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($28,990) and the ninetieth ($95,830) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Texas's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $42,321 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Texas levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $41,126 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 48 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.