Nurse Practitioners in Washington
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$117,960
after federal, FICA and Washington tax
Tax takes
$38,140
24.4% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$108,657
Washington costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Washington — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$156,100
Kept after tax
$117,960
Worth in national money
$108,657
State rank
3
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for nurse practitioners is strong here. Washington's middle earner gets $156,100, putting the state 3 of 51 — about 17.99% ahead of the national figure.
- This is one of the better-paid jobs in Washington. It ranks 27 out of 493 occupations the state publishes figures for, which puts it in the top quarter locally.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $156,100 the take-home is $117,960. But Washington costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $108,657 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is lower, $152,180, so pay clusters nearer the top than usual.
- For nurse practitioners, Washington sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $156,100, ranking 3 of 51 and running about 17.99% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Within Washington, nurse practitioners ranks 27 of 493 occupations by median pay, placing it in the top quartile of the local distribution. This is the comparison a resident actually makes — against neighbors rather than against the same job elsewhere.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and Washington income tax is $117,960 for nurse practitioners, from $156,100. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $108,657. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $152,180 falls below the median, a left skew that is uncommon in wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Nurse Practitioners
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $122,420 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $156,100 |
| Top tenth earn over | $187,240 |
| This salary | $156,100 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Washington | $117,960 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $117,960 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$12,732 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $156,100 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$18,102 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 109 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of nurse practitioners in Washington earn under $156,100 and half over. The published range runs $122,420 at the tenth percentile to $187,240 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In Washington the take-home figure of $117,960, from $156,100, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 27 of 493 occupations here.
- Two cautions on $108,657, the adjusted value of that $156,100 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Washington. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 27 of 493 locally.
- Figures are distribution medians for nurse practitioners in Washington, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $122,420 to $187,240; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $117,960 from $156,100. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 27 of 493 locally.
- This $108,657 adjusted figure, worked from $156,100, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 27 of 493 in the state. The occupation ranks 27 of 493 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $122,420 and the top tenth $187,240, so most people doing this work in Washington sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $108,657 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Less than people assume. $117,960 of this wage reaches your account, because Washington takes no income tax from wages — but federal tax, Social Security and Medicare still apply exactly as they do everywhere else.
Can I compare this job across every state?
All 51 jurisdictions report this work, which makes the ranking a like-for-like one.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($122,420 to $187,240) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Washington rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $108,657 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $117,960 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.