Orderlies in New Hampshire

A stethoscope and folded scrubs in a sunlit clinical workspace.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$35,003

after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax

Tax takes

$5,847

14.3% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$33,227

New Hampshire costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$40,850

Kept after tax

$35,003

Worth in national money

$33,227

State rank

12

of 47 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • New Hampshire is one of the better-paying states for orderlies. The middle earner takes $40,850, which ranks 12 of 47 states with published figures. That is about 6.69% above the national middle.
  • Measured against other jobs in New Hampshire, this one sits low: 430 of 488 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $40,850 the take-home is $35,003. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $33,227 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $43,380, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • New Hampshire ranks 12 of 47 states publishing a median for orderlies, at $40,850 — about 6.69% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
  • Orderlies occupies position 430 of 488 in New Hampshire's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $35,003 for orderlies, from $40,850. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $33,227. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $43,380 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Orderlies

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$35,900
Half earn under$40,850
Top tenth earn over$48,530
This salary$40,850

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in New Hampshire$35,003
Take-home in Texas$35,003
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$2,794

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $40,850$37,471
$37,471in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$40,850
You could take a cut of−$3,379
Prices in Texas97 vs 105

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $40,850. The published range is $35,900 up to $48,530, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind New Hampshire's $35,003, worked from $40,850. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 430 of 488.
  • Two cautions on $33,227, the adjusted value of that $40,850 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of New Hampshire. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 430 of 488 locally.
  • Reported values are medians; for orderlies in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $35,900 to $48,530. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
  • The New Hampshire take-home of $35,003, on $40,850 for work ranking 430 of 488 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 430 of 488 in the state.
  • This $33,227 adjusted figure, worked from $40,850, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 430 of 488 in the state. The occupation ranks 430 of 488 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $43,380, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $35,900 and the top tenth $48,530, so most people doing this work in New Hampshire sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $33,227 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $35,003 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 47 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $43,380. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($35,900 to $48,530) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $33,227 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $35,003 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 47 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.