Packaging and Filling Machine Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts

Machined metal parts and a CNC machine in a clean manufacturing workshop.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$32,911

after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax

Tax takes

$7,449

18.5% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$30,406

Massachusetts costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$40,360

Kept after tax

$32,911

Worth in national money

$30,406

State rank

33

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Massachusetts sits in the middle of the pack for this job. The median is $40,360, ranking 33 of 50 states with figures. Close enough to the national middle that where you live matters more than the headline suggests.
  • Measured against other jobs in Massachusetts, this one sits low: 442 of 485 occupations with published pay, in the bottom quarter.
  • The wage here flatters the reality. From $40,360 the take-home is $32,911. But Massachusetts costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $30,406 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $43,100, because the best-paid pull it up.
  • Massachusetts occupies the middle band for packaging and filling machine operators and tenders: a median of $40,360, ranking 33 of 50. Where nominal pay is close to the national figure, the tax and price adjustments below carry proportionally more weight in determining the real outcome.
  • Packaging and filling machine operators and tenders occupies position 442 of 485 in Massachusetts's occupational wage distribution, in the bottom quartile. National ranking and local ranking answer different questions and frequently disagree; this is the one a resident experiences.
  • Retained pay after federal, FICA and Massachusetts income tax is $32,911 for packaging and filling machine operators and tenders, from $40,360. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $30,406. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $43,100 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Packaging and Filling Machine Operators and Tenders

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$33,550
Half earn under$40,360
Top tenth earn over$55,470
This salary$40,360

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$1,698take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Massachusetts$32,911
Take-home in Texas$34,609
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$5,209

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $40,360$34,060
$34,060in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$38,247
You could take a cut of−$6,300
Prices in Texas97 vs 108

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $40,360 as a midpoint for Massachusetts, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $33,550 and the ninetieth is $55,470 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • One filer, no dependants, no pension contributions — that is the household behind Massachusetts's $32,911, worked from $40,360. That is on purpose. It lets states be compared with each other, not with each other's family circumstances. Local city taxes are left out. Locally this work ranks 442 of 485.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $30,406 uses one figure for the whole of Massachusetts. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 485 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 442.
  • The Massachusetts median of $40,360 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $33,550 to $55,470. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • The Massachusetts take-home of $32,911, on $40,360 for work ranking 442 of 485 locally, models the simplest household deliberately: holding it constant is what makes the interstate comparison meaningful. It also means the absolute figure overstates liability for most real filers, and municipal income taxes are outside the model entirely. The occupation ranks 442 of 485 in the state.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $30,406, worked from $40,360, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Massachusetts address, on work sitting at 442 of 485 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $43,100, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $33,550 and the top tenth $55,470, so most people doing this work in Massachusetts sit within a fairly tight band.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $30,406 of national purchasing power.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Three of them are federal and one is not. After income tax, Social Security, Medicare and Massachusetts's own levy, $32,911 remains.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $43,100. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($33,550 to $55,470) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Massachusetts rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $30,406 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $32,911 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.