Pest Control Workers in Alaska
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$39,864
after federal, FICA and Alaska tax
Tax takes
$7,036
15.0% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$39,192
Alaska costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Alaska — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$46,900
Kept after tax
$39,864
Worth in national money
$39,192
State rank
14
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- This is a good state for the work. Alaska pays pest control workers a middle wage of $46,900, ranking 14 of 50 states and sitting about 3.65% above the national middle.
- Within Alaska this is lower-paid work. Of 430 occupations the state publishes figures for, pest control workers ranks 345. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
- No great distortion either way. Alaska costs about what the country costs, so from $46,900, take-home of $39,864 is worth roughly $39,192 in national money. The average comes to $52,680, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Alaska's median for pest control workers is $46,900, about 3.65% above the national figure and 14 of 50 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
- Against every occupation Alaska reports, pest control workers ranks 345 of 430, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
- Price parity in Alaska is near the national base, so for pest control workers, whose median is $46,900, the adjusted figure of $39,192 differs little from $39,864 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $52,680 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Pest Control Workers
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $35,580 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $46,900 |
| Top tenth earn over | $75,180 |
| This salary | $46,900 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Alaska | $39,864 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $39,864 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$1,831 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $46,900 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$2,214 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 102 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of pest control workers in Alaska earn under $46,900 and half over. The published range runs $35,580 at the tenth percentile to $75,180 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In Alaska the take-home figure of $39,864, from $46,900, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 345 of 430 occupations here.
- One number stands for prices across all of Alaska, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $39,192, the adjusted value of that $46,900 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 345 of 430 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for pest control workers in Alaska, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $35,580 to $75,180; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for Alaska is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $39,864 from $46,900. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 345 of 430 locally.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for Alaska, so $39,192 — the adjusted value of that $46,900 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 345 of 430 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
No — it is the middle. Half of these workers earn more and half earn less. The average is $52,680, pulled upward by the top of the range, which is why the middle is the fairer number to plan against.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $35,580, the highest tenth $75,180, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Alaska costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $39,192 rather than its face figure.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $39,864 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 50 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Alaska is $52,680. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($35,580) and the ninetieth ($75,180) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Alaska's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $39,192 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
Alaska levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $39,864 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.