Radiologic Technologists and Technicians in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$68,564
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$16,346
19.3% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$65,085
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$84,910
Kept after tax
$68,564
Worth in national money
$65,085
State rank
16
of 51 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Pay for this job is strong here. New Hampshire's middle earner gets $84,910, putting the state 16 of 51 — about 5.99% ahead of the national figure.
- Within New Hampshire this is well-paid work. Of 488 occupations with published figures in the state, this job ranks 106 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- The wage here flatters the reality. From $84,910 the take-home is $68,564. But New Hampshire costs more than the national average, so that money behaves more like $65,085 would elsewhere. Worth knowing before comparing offers across states. The average is higher, $87,410, because the best-paid pull it up.
- For radiologic technologists and technicians, New Hampshire sits in the upper band nationally: a median of $84,910, ranking 16 of 51 and running about 5.99% above the national midpoint. Nominal advantage of this size is usually, though not always, large enough to survive the state's own tax and price levels.
- Ranked against every occupation New Hampshire publishes a median for, radiologic technologists and technicians sits 106 of 488 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- Retained pay after federal, FICA and New Hampshire income tax is $68,564 for radiologic technologists and technicians, from $84,910. The state's price level exceeds the national average, so the price-adjusted equivalent is $65,085. ⚠️ This is purchasing power and not a wage; cross-state offer comparisons that stop at the nominal figure systematically overvalue high-cost states. The mean of $87,410 sits above the median, the right skew typical of wage data.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Radiologic Technologists and Technicians
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $64,620 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $84,910 |
| Top tenth earn over | $106,370 |
| This salary | $84,910 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $68,564 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $68,564 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$5,472 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $84,910 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$7,559 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of radiologic technologists and technicians in New Hampshire earn under $84,910 and half over. The published range runs $64,620 at the tenth percentile to $106,370 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- In New Hampshire the take-home figure of $68,564, from $84,910, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 106 of 488 occupations here.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $65,085, the adjusted value of that $84,910 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 106 of 488 in the state.
- Figures are distribution medians for radiologic technologists and technicians in New Hampshire, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $64,620 to $106,370; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Take-home for New Hampshire is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $68,564 from $84,910. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 106 of 488 locally.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $65,085 — the adjusted value of that $84,910 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 106 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
How much does pay for this job actually vary?
Less than you might expect. The bottom tenth earn $64,620 and the top tenth $106,370, so most people doing this work in New Hampshire sit within a fairly tight band.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
A larger wage in a dearer place is not automatically more. Adjusted for local prices, this pay behaves like $65,085 of national purchasing power.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
No. $68,564 survives, because New Hampshire levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.
Can I compare this job across every state?
Yes for this one. Pay is published in all 51 jurisdictions, so a state-to-state comparison here rests on the same survey everywhere rather than on a patchwork.
What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?
The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($64,620 to $106,370) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to New Hampshire rather than a national figure.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $65,085 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $68,564 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Is this occupation's state coverage complete?
State-level estimates are published for all 51 jurisdictions for this occupation, so cross-state comparison is not confounded by suppression. ⚠️ Estimates remain survey-based and carry sampling error; small differences between adjacent states should not be over-read.