Statisticians in New Hampshire
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$76,422
after federal, FICA and New Hampshire tax
Tax takes
$19,658
20.5% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$72,545
New Hampshire costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in New Hampshire — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$96,080
Kept after tax
$76,422
Worth in national money
$72,545
State rank
26
of 45 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Neither high nor low. New Hampshire is 26 of 45 states for statisticians, with a middle wage of $96,080. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
- Within New Hampshire this is well-paid work. Of 488 occupations with published figures in the state, statisticians ranks 85 — in the top quarter of everything people do there.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $96,080, tax leaves $76,422 — and because New Hampshire is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $72,545 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $103,400, since top earners drag the number up.
- New Hampshire ranks 26 of 45 for statisticians at $96,080. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
- Ranked against every occupation New Hampshire publishes a median for, statisticians sits 85 of 488 — the upper quartile of the state's wage distribution. National standing and within-state standing are separate questions, and a job can occupy very different positions on each.
- After tax, $76,422 remains from the New Hampshire median of $96,080 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $72,545 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $103,400 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Statisticians
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $65,300 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $96,080 |
| Top tenth earn over | $159,850 |
| This salary | $96,080 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in New Hampshire | $76,422 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $76,422 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$6,099 |
The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $96,080 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$8,425 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 105 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in New Hampshire earn less than $96,080. The published range is $65,300 up to $159,850, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $76,422 take-home in New Hampshire comes from $96,080. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 85 of 488.
- One number stands for prices across all of New Hampshire, which is a simplification — big cities cost far more than small towns. Read $72,545, the adjusted value of that $96,080 median, as a way to compare states fairly, not as a quote for any particular place. The two datasets are also from different years. This job sits at 85 of 488 in the state.
- Reported values are medians; for statisticians in New Hampshire the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $65,300 to $159,850. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $76,422, from $96,080, assumes a single New Hampshire filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 85 of 488 locally, and the state ranks 26 of 45 for it.
- Price deflation uses one statewide parity for New Hampshire, so $72,545 — the adjusted value of that $96,080 median — establishes comparability between states rather than accuracy within one. The wage and parity series are dated independently, each following its own publication cycle, and neither is projected forward. This occupation sits at 85 of 488 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $103,400 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
The label is broader than the work. From $65,300 at the bottom tenth to $159,850 at the top, the same title covers roles that share little beyond a name.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
Not on its own. Prices in New Hampshire run above the national level, so the same dollars buy less here. Adjusted for that, this pay is worth $72,545 — the wage did not change, only what it covers.
Is most of this wage taxed away?
Most of it arrives. $76,422 lands after tax, since there is no state income tax on wages here — though the federal floor is identical in every state.
Why is this job missing from some states?
A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 45 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in New Hampshire is $103,400. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($65,300) and the ninetieth ($159,850) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
New Hampshire's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $72,545 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?
New Hampshire levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $76,422 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 45 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.