Structural Iron and Steel Workers in Montana

A hard hat, safety glasses and tool belt beside timber house framing.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$53,792

after federal, FICA and Montana tax

Tax takes

$13,598

20.2% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$59,608

Montana costs less than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$67,390

Kept after tax

$53,792

Worth in national money

$59,608

State rank

23

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Middling, nationally. Montana pays structural iron and steel workers around $67,390 at the midpoint, 23 of 50 states. The interesting numbers on this page are the two below it.
  • Ordinary, locally speaking. Structural iron and steel workers ranks 158 among 475 occupations Montana publishes pay for.
  • Here is where Montana does better than its wage suggests. From a median of $67,390 you keep $53,792, and because things cost less here than the national average, that behaves like $59,608 would elsewhere. The average is lower, $64,530, so pay clusters nearer the top than usual.
  • For structural iron and steel workers the Montana median is $67,390, ranking 23 of 50 states reporting. Mid-band nominal positions are the ones most frequently reordered by the adjustments, because no large wage premium exists to absorb a state's tax or price level.
  • Position 158 of 475 in Montana places structural iron and steel workers in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
  • After federal, FICA and Montana income tax, retained pay for structural iron and steel workers on $67,390 is $53,792. Deflating by the state's price level — below the national average — gives $59,608 in national-average terms. ⚠️ That figure is purchasing power, not a wage, and nobody is paid it; it is what the take-home buys. The mean of $64,530 falls below the median, a left skew that is uncommon in wage data.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Structural Iron and Steel Workers

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$47,880
Half earn under$67,390
Top tenth earn over$75,690
This salary$67,390

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
+$2,447take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Montana$53,792
Take-home in Texas$56,239
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity−$1,734

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0$69,785
$69,785in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$64,234
Raise you would need+$2,395
Prices in Texas97 vs 90

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of structural iron and steel workers in Montana earn under $67,390 and half over. The published range runs $47,880 at the tenth percentile to $75,690 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In Montana the take-home figure of $53,792, from $67,390, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 158 of 475 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $59,608 uses one figure for the whole of Montana. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 475 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 158.
  • Figures are distribution medians for structural iron and steel workers in Montana, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $47,880 to $75,690; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for Montana is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $53,792 from $67,390. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 158 of 475 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $59,608, worked from $67,390, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Montana address, on work sitting at 158 of 475 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $64,530, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

Most of these jobs pay within a close range — $47,880 at the tenth percentile, $75,690 at the ninetieth.

What does this pay actually buy where I live?

Further than the number implies. Montana is cheaper than the national average, so this take-home behaves like $59,608 in national terms.

Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?

Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Montana then takes its own share, leaving $53,792.

Why is this job missing from some states?

Because the survey suppresses a figure when too few employers report it. This occupation has published pay in 50 states — the rest are withheld to protect confidentiality, which is not the same as nobody doing the work there.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Montana is $64,530. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($47,880 to $75,690) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Montana rather than a national figure.

What is this occupation's price-adjusted compensation in this state?

Montana's regional price parity is at or below the national average, so nominal wages understate purchasing power. Take-home deflated by the state price level is $59,608 in national-average terms. The adjustment uses an all-items index and does not isolate housing.

What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?

Take-home of $53,792 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Montana income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.