Surveying and Mapping Technicians in California
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$60,604
after federal, FICA and California tax
Tax takes
$17,506
22.4% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$53,831
California costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in California — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$78,110
Kept after tax
$60,604
Worth in national money
$53,831
State rank
1
of 50 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- California is one of the better-paying states for surveying and mapping technicians. The middle earner takes $78,110, which ranks 1 of 50 states with published figures. That is about 44.01% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Surveying and mapping technicians ranks 209 among 492 occupations California publishes pay for.
- Costs eat into it here. Of $78,110, tax leaves $60,604 — and because California is dearer than average, that stretches only as far as $53,831 would nationally. Averages run higher here, $81,840, since top earners drag the number up.
- California ranks 1 of 50 states publishing a median for surveying and mapping technicians, at $78,110 — about 44.01% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Position 209 of 492 in California places surveying and mapping technicians in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- After tax, $60,604 remains from the California median of $78,110 for this occupation. Applying the state's above-average price parity yields $53,831 in national-average terms — the quantity relevant to a relocation decision, and the one absent from essentially every published wage comparison. Mean pay of $81,840 exceeds the median, so the upper tail is doing the work.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Surveying and Mapping Technicians
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $48,000 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $78,110 |
| Top tenth earn over | $119,270 |
| This salary | $78,110 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in California | $60,604 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $63,780 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$11,803 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $73,595 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$15,720 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 113 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of surveying and mapping technicians in California earn under $78,110 and half over. The published range runs $48,000 at the tenth percentile to $119,270 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
- That $60,604 take-home in California comes from $78,110. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 209 of 492.
- Two cautions on $53,831, the adjusted value of that $78,110 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of California. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 209 of 492 locally.
- Figures are distribution medians for surveying and mapping technicians in California, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $48,000 to $119,270; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
- Retained pay of $60,604, from $78,110, assumes a single California filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 209 of 492 locally, and the state ranks 1 of 50 for it.
- This $53,831 adjusted figure, worked from $78,110, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 209 of 492 in the state. The occupation ranks 209 of 492 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $81,840 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $48,000 and the top tenth $119,270 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. California costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $53,831 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; California then takes its own share, leaving $60,604.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in California is $81,840. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($48,000) and the ninetieth ($119,270) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
California's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $53,831 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $60,604 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and California income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.