Surveyors in Washington

A pale wooden scale model and metal measuring tools on an engineering workbench.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$69,057

after federal, FICA and Washington tax

Tax takes

$16,553

19.3% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$63,610

Washington costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$85,610

Kept after tax

$69,057

Worth in national money

$63,610

State rank

5

of 50 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • This is a good state for the work. Washington pays surveyors a middle wage of $85,610, ranking 5 of 50 states and sitting about 13.48% above the national middle.
  • Against other work in Washington, this sits in the middle: 165 of 493 occupations with published pay. Solidly ordinary for the state, which is not the same as ordinary nationally.
  • Washington is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $85,610 the take-home is $69,057; in national-average money that behaves like $63,610. The average comes to $95,530, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Washington's median for surveyors is $85,610, about 13.48% above the national figure and 5 of 50 states reporting. Whether that premium reaches the worker depends on the two adjustments below, which is the part a wage table cannot tell you.
  • Surveyors ranks 165 of 493 occupations in Washington by median pay, in the middle bands. Within-state and national positions are separate measurements and a job commonly sits in different quartiles on each.
  • Take-home for surveyors in Washington, on $85,610, is $69,057; deflated by the state's price level, $63,610. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $95,530 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Surveyors

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$63,860
Half earn under$85,610
Top tenth earn over$134,620
This salary$85,610

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Washington$69,057
Take-home in Texas$69,057
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$7,454

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $85,610$75,314
$75,314in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$85,610
You could take a cut of−$10,296
Prices in Texas97 vs 109

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • Treat $85,610 as a midpoint for Washington, not a promise. The tenth percentile is $63,860 and the ninetieth is $134,620 — a wide band, and where you land in it depends on far more than the state.
  • In Washington the take-home figure of $69,057, from $85,610, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 165 of 493 occupations here.
  • The wage data and the price data come from different years. That is how each is published. The price adjustment behind $63,610 uses one figure for the whole of Washington. A city and a rural county there can differ by more than two states do. Out of 493 occupations the state publishes, this one sits at 165.
  • The Washington median of $85,610 describes the midpoint of a distribution spanning $63,860 to $134,620. Because that spread is typically larger than the interstate spread, a state median is a weak predictor for any individual worker in this occupation.
  • Take-home for Washington is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $69,057 from $85,610. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 165 of 493 locally.
  • Wage and price series carry different reference periods, each published on its own schedule. The real-terms figure of $63,610, worked from $85,610, deflates by a statewide parity that conceals substantial intra-state variation, concentrated in housing — so it supports comparison between states rather than the pricing of a move to a particular Washington address, on work sitting at 165 of 493 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

Half earn more than this and half earn less. The average sits at $95,530 because a long tail of high pay lifts it, so the two answer different questions.

Why is the pay range for this job so wide?

One title, many jobs. The lowest tenth take $63,860, the highest tenth $134,620, and what separates them is experience, employer and what exactly the role does.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Washington costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $63,610 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $69,057 survives, because Washington levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 50 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Washington is $95,530. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?

Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($63,860) and the ninetieth ($134,620) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Washington's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $63,610 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Washington levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $69,057 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 50 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.