Weighers, Measurers, Checkers, and Samplers, Recordkeeping in Alaska

A person arriving at a home office with a bag beside a laptop and navy coffee cup.

May 2025 wages · tax year 2026

You keep

$38,948

after federal, FICA and Alaska tax

Tax takes

$6,812

14.9% of the whole

Worth, in national money

$38,291

Alaska costs more than average

One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.

Median here

$45,760

Kept after tax

$38,948

Worth in national money

$38,291

State rank

31

of 49 states

What this pays, and what it is worth

  • Neither high nor low. Alaska is 31 of 49 states for this job, with a middle wage of $45,760. What that is worth is the question the rest of this page answers.
  • Within Alaska this is lower-paid work. Of 430 occupations the state publishes figures for, this job ranks 363. That is the bottom quarter locally, whatever the national comparison says.
  • No great distortion either way. Alaska costs about what the country costs, so from $45,760, take-home of $38,948 is worth roughly $38,291 in national money. The average comes to $48,120, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
  • Alaska ranks 31 of 49 for weighers, measurers, checkers, and samplers, recordkeeping at $45,760. The nominal figure is unremarkable; the adjusted figures are where the state's actual position for this occupation is determined.
  • Against every occupation Alaska reports, weighers, measurers, checkers, and samplers, recordkeeping ranks 363 of 430, in the lowest quartile of the state's distribution. That position is set by the local labor market and is independent of how the state compares nationally for this work.
  • Price parity in Alaska is near the national base, so for weighers, measurers, checkers, and samplers, recordkeeping, whose median is $45,760, the adjusted figure of $38,291 differs little from $38,948 retained after tax. The state's position for this occupation is therefore set by wage and tax rather than by living costs. At $48,120 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.

Compare this career across states

Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.

Pay band: Weighers, Measurers, Checkers, and Samplers, Recordkeeping

The state median for this job

50thpercentile, roughly
Lowest tenth earn under$40,630
Half earn under$45,760
Top tenth earn over$57,750
This salary$45,760

Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.

The same pay, somewhere else

The state median for this job

Compare with
$0take-home per year in Texas
Take-home in Alaska$38,948
Take-home in Texas$38,948
Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity+$1,789

The raise and the real gain point in opposite directions here.

State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.

What you would need there

The state median for this job

Moving to
$0now · $45,760$43,596
$43,596in Texas, for the same life
To match take-home only$45,760
You could take a cut of−$2,164
Prices in Texas97 vs 102

State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.

Sources and assumptions
  • A median is the middle, not an offer. Half of weighers, measurers, checkers, and samplers, recordkeeping in Alaska earn under $45,760 and half over. The published range runs $40,630 at the tenth percentile to $57,750 at the ninetieth. Experience and employer move an individual a long way inside that.
  • In Alaska the take-home figure of $38,948, from $45,760, assumes one filer, no dependants, and nothing paid into a pension before tax. Each of those lowers the bill, so treat it as the plain case. City and school-district income taxes are not included either, and in a few states those are real money. It ranks 363 of 430 occupations here.
  • Two cautions on $38,291, the adjusted value of that $45,760 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Alaska. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 363 of 430 locally.
  • Figures are distribution medians for weighers, measurers, checkers, and samplers, recordkeeping in Alaska, not entry or offer rates. The published band runs $40,630 to $57,750; within-state dispersion of that width routinely exceeds the dispersion between states, so tenure, employer and metropolitan area predict an individual's pay better than geography does.
  • Take-home for Alaska is computed for a single filer taking the standard deduction with no dependants and no pre-tax contributions, giving $38,948 from $45,760. Each omitted item reduces taxable income, so the figure is a lower bound on retained pay for this household shape. Municipal and school-district income taxes are excluded, which understates the burden materially in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The occupation ranks 363 of 430 locally.
  • This $38,291 adjusted figure, worked from $45,760, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 363 of 430 in the state. The occupation ranks 363 of 430 locally.

Questions people ask

Is this the average pay for the job?

It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $48,120, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.

How much does pay for this job actually vary?

The range here is narrow. From $40,630 at the bottom tenth to $57,750 at the top, pay for this work clusters rather than spreads.

Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?

The number and the value are different things. Alaska costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $38,291 rather than its face figure.

Is most of this wage taxed away?

No. $38,948 survives, because Alaska levies no wage income tax. The federal share does not change with the state you work in.

Why is this job missing from some states?

A blank is a suppression, not a zero. 49 states have a published figure for this work; the others had too few responses to release one.

How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?

The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Alaska is $48,120. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.

What is the dispersion of this occupation's wage distribution?

The tenth-to-ninetieth percentile span ($40,630 to $57,750) sits at or below the family's median dispersion, indicating relatively standardized compensation. Percentiles are published per state, so this dispersion is specific to Alaska rather than a national figure.

How does the state price level affect real compensation?

Alaska's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $38,291 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.

Why is the take-home ratio comparatively high in this state?

Alaska levies no personal income tax on wages, so take-home of $38,948 reflects the federal layer and FICA alone. Federal income tax and FICA are unchanged; states without a wage income tax generally recover revenue through consumption and property bases instead.

Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?

BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 49 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.