Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists in Massachusetts
May 2025 wages · tax year 2026
You keep
$64,273
after federal, FICA and Massachusetts tax
Tax takes
$20,077
23.8% of the whole
Worth, in national money
$59,381
Massachusetts costs more than average
On that salary you would be around the 25th percentile for this work in Massachusetts — roughly, since only five points along the band are published.
One filer, standard deduction, no dependants and nothing paid in before tax — the same household the rest of this page uses, so the comparison holds. City and school-district income taxes are not included.
Median here
$84,350
Kept after tax
$64,273
Worth in national money
$59,381
State rank
9
of 47 states
What this pays, and what it is worth
- Massachusetts is one of the better-paying states for zoologists and wildlife biologists. The middle earner takes $84,350, which ranks 9 of 47 states with published figures. That is about 9.86% above the national middle.
- Ordinary, locally speaking. Zoologists and wildlife biologists ranks 160 among 485 occupations Massachusetts publishes pay for.
- Massachusetts is an expensive state, and the adjusted figure shows it. From $84,350 the take-home is $64,273; in national-average money that behaves like $59,381. The average comes to $90,780, above the middle, thanks to the top of the range.
- Massachusetts ranks 9 of 47 states publishing a median for zoologists and wildlife biologists, at $84,350 — about 9.86% above the national median. A state's position on nominal pay is the figure wage tables report and the least informative of the three on this page, because it survives neither the tax adjustment nor the price adjustment intact for most occupations.
- Position 160 of 485 in Massachusetts places zoologists and wildlife biologists in the middle of the state's wage distribution. Because within-state and cross-state rankings measure different things, this figure and the national one above should be read together rather than as a single verdict.
- Take-home for zoologists and wildlife biologists in Massachusetts, on $84,350, is $64,273; deflated by the state's price level, $59,381. ⚠️ The deflator is statewide, so it understates the erosion in the state's metropolitan areas and overstates it outside them. At $90,780 the mean overshoots the median — the usual right-skewed shape.
Compare this career across states
Choose your filing status and local taxes, compare pay, and keep a shortlist.Compare wage and personal-pay outcomes by state, with selected resident local taxes and saved career choices.
Pay band: Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists
The state median for this job
| Lowest tenth earn under | $45,310 |
|---|---|
| Half earn under | $84,350 |
| Top tenth earn over | $138,940 |
| This salary | $84,350 |
Positions between the published tenth, quarter, half, three-quarter and ninetieth points are estimated by straight line.
The same pay, somewhere else
The state median for this job
| Take-home in Massachusetts | $64,273 |
|---|---|
| Take-home in Texas | $68,170 |
| Once local prices are leveledBEA price parity | +$10,771 |
State income tax and state price levels only. No city income tax, and no housing market.
What you would need there
The state median for this job
| To match take-home only | $78,810 |
|---|---|
| You could take a cut of | −$14,878 |
| Prices in Texas | 97 vs 108 |
State taxes and state price levels only. No city tax, and no housing market.
Sources and assumptions
- Half the people doing this work in Massachusetts earn less than $84,350. The published range is $45,310 up to $138,940, so an individual figure can sit a long way from the middle in either direction.
- That $64,273 take-home in Massachusetts comes from $84,350. It is the no-frills case: single filer, standard deduction, nothing set aside before tax. Real circumstances almost always reduce the tax. City and school-district taxes are not counted at all. Locally the work ranks 160 of 485.
- Two cautions on $59,381, the adjusted value of that $84,350 median. It levels out prices with a single number for all of Massachusetts. No actual address matches that. The wage figures and price figures are also from different years. Each is published on its own timetable. This work sits at 160 of 485 locally.
- Reported values are medians; for zoologists and wildlife biologists in Massachusetts the tenth-to-ninetieth percentile band is $45,310 to $138,940. Neither the median nor the band is an offer rate, and neither accounts for hours, shift differentials or overtime.
- Retained pay of $64,273, from $84,350, assumes a single Massachusetts filer with the standard deduction and no elective deferrals. Pre-tax retirement or HSA contributions, dependants and itemized deductions all reduce it further; local income taxes, excluded here, would increase it in the states that levy them. This occupation ranks 160 of 485 locally, and the state ranks 9 of 47 for it.
- This $59,381 adjusted figure, worked from $84,350, rests on a state-level price parity averaging over within-state dispersion larger than much of the between-state dispersion. Wage and price vintages differ by publication schedule. The result is directionally sound and not address-specific, for work at 160 of 485 in the state. The occupation ranks 160 of 485 locally.
Questions people ask
Is this the average pay for the job?
It is the midpoint, not the average. The average here is $90,780, dragged up by high earners; the middle figure describes a typical worker better.
Why is the pay range for this job so wide?
Because one job title covers very different work. The bottom tenth here earn $45,310 and the top tenth $138,940 — experience, employer and specialism separate them, and a single figure hides all three.
Does a bigger number here mean I am better off?
The number and the value are different things. Massachusetts costs more than the national average, so this take-home stretches like $59,381 rather than its face figure.
Where does the difference between the wage and my paycheck go?
Four deductions, stacked. The federal layer and the two payroll taxes apply wherever you work; Massachusetts then takes its own share, leaving $64,273.
Why is this job missing from some states?
The survey withholds small samples rather than publish an unreliable number. Pay appears for 47 states here, and a missing state means too few reports, not no jobs.
How does the published median differ from the mean for this occupation?
The median is the midpoint of the distribution; the mean for this occupation in Massachusetts is $90,780. Wage distributions are right-skewed, so the mean exceeds the median wherever a minority earn substantially more. BLS publishes both because substituting one for the other misstates a typical worker's pay.
What drives the percentile dispersion in this occupation?
Dispersion between the tenth percentile ($45,310) and the ninetieth ($138,940) exceeds the family median dispersion. SOC codes aggregate roles differing in seniority, industry and specialisation, and BLS does not disaggregate below the detailed occupation level, so within-title variance is not separable from the published series.
How does the state price level affect real compensation?
Massachusetts's regional price parity sits above the national average, so nominal wages overstate purchasing power. Deflating take-home by the state price level gives $59,381 in national-average terms. ⚠️ RPPs are an all-items index; housing parities vary far more widely than the headline figure.
What accounts for the gap between gross wage and take-home here?
Take-home of $64,273 reflects federal income tax, OASDI, Medicare and Massachusetts income tax for a single filer with no adjustments. The state layer is levied in addition to the federal one; only its rate and base differ between states.
Why does this occupation lack published estimates in every state?
BLS suppresses estimates failing disclosure or reliability criteria. This occupation has published state-level estimates in 47 of the fifty-one jurisdictions. Suppression reflects sample size and confidentiality rules, and cannot be read as an absence of employment.